SCT Celestron 9.25 for Solar Imaging
SCT Celestron 9.25 for Solar Imaging
I am new to Solar Imaging, and I would like to use my old Celestron 9.25. I have my eyes on an Off axis ERF, a quark Combo and a Baader Planetarioum TZ4. Is this configuration acceptable?
Thank you for your help
Thank you for your help
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42272
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20437 times
- Been thanked: 10245 times
- Contact:
Re: SCT Celestron 9.25 for Solar Imaging
Hi there and welcome to the forum.
Your c9 is f10 already, stopping it down is going to make it closer to f20/f30, so using the TZ4 in addition would put it around f80/f120, which, is way too high. Is the c9 your only scope or do you have a smaller refractor?
Your c9 is f10 already, stopping it down is going to make it closer to f20/f30, so using the TZ4 in addition would put it around f80/f120, which, is way too high. Is the c9 your only scope or do you have a smaller refractor?
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
Re: SCT Celestron 9.25 for Solar Imaging
Thank you for the reply. Yes I have a RedCat 51 250mm F 4.9, but I use it mainly for wide field astrophotography.
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42272
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20437 times
- Been thanked: 10245 times
- Contact:
Re: SCT Celestron 9.25 for Solar Imaging
If you are going to stop the SCT down (with off axis ERF) then you will be running around 60-70mm aperture I guess? If this is the case then you would not need the TZ4.
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
Re: SCT Celestron 9.25 for Solar Imaging
I hope you can help me here.
I have a celestron 9.25 with an off axis ERF and a quark combo HA,;trying to take some images with a ZWO 174.
No matter what I do I fail to have a decent focus. I assume is the backend focus the issue.
An Celestron 9.25 has a back focus of 139 mm and the Quark adds 99mm is that correct?
Also if I need to put extension rings to achieve the Blackfoot us distance am I correct in assuming the the extensions go after the Quark combo?
Basically SCT + Quark + Ext rings + zWO
Thank you for your help.
I have a celestron 9.25 with an off axis ERF and a quark combo HA,;trying to take some images with a ZWO 174.
No matter what I do I fail to have a decent focus. I assume is the backend focus the issue.
An Celestron 9.25 has a back focus of 139 mm and the Quark adds 99mm is that correct?
Also if I need to put extension rings to achieve the Blackfoot us distance am I correct in assuming the the extensions go after the Quark combo?
Basically SCT + Quark + Ext rings + zWO
Thank you for your help.
-
- Ohhhhhh My!
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 12:26 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
Re: SCT Celestron 9.25 for Solar Imaging
You will NEVER get a decent image with that configuration!
You will need a 1.25" SCT wedge drawtube from Daystar.
The filter needs "to look" off-axis too!!. The Quark needs to tilt a little bit. It will never show you any h-alpha details at all. You will be outside the center line. And please look at the Sun visually and see the features etc. before trying to take photos again.
Why Daystar do not say how to use a off-axis SCT - I don't know!
The photo shows you my former 9.25 SCT and my old Daystar. The filter was a ATM Daystar filter - now upgraded to a Quantum. You can se the tilt wedge just before the filter and you can see that the filter + diagonal has a slight off-axis tilt.
You will need a 1.25" SCT wedge drawtube from Daystar.
The filter needs "to look" off-axis too!!. The Quark needs to tilt a little bit. It will never show you any h-alpha details at all. You will be outside the center line. And please look at the Sun visually and see the features etc. before trying to take photos again.
Why Daystar do not say how to use a off-axis SCT - I don't know!
The photo shows you my former 9.25 SCT and my old Daystar. The filter was a ATM Daystar filter - now upgraded to a Quantum. You can se the tilt wedge just before the filter and you can see that the filter + diagonal has a slight off-axis tilt.
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42272
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20437 times
- Been thanked: 10245 times
- Contact:
Re: SCT Celestron 9.25 for Solar Imaging
In addition to the above, is the scope collimated well?
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
Re: SCT Celestron 9.25 for Solar Imaging
So, it is collimated well enough, as I use it for Moon and deep space photography.
I am aware of the tilt aspect/requirement and the alignment as highlighted in their guide.
This is my first attempt to capture the sun and I have to admit I never realised I needed a 1.25" SCT wedge drawtube, their instructions are indeed not clear. I have to ask...
How is the draw tube dealing with the backfocus element? and also what do you meant will never show you any h-alpha details at all?
Thank you again
I am aware of the tilt aspect/requirement and the alignment as highlighted in their guide.
This is my first attempt to capture the sun and I have to admit I never realised I needed a 1.25" SCT wedge drawtube, their instructions are indeed not clear. I have to ask...
How is the draw tube dealing with the backfocus element? and also what do you meant will never show you any h-alpha details at all?
Thank you again
-
- Ohhhhhh My!
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 12:26 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
Re: SCT Celestron 9.25 for Solar Imaging
If you do not tilt the filter in an off-axis SCT you will not be able to see any h-alpha features. It is the way an interference filter works. It will be several Angstroms from the center line. I don't know about the Quark wedge draw tube. But the Quantum filter wedge I still have do not change the backfocus point. You can see the wedge on page 1 in the Quark Combo manual. http://www.daystarfilters.com/downloads ... al-new.pdf
Re: SCT Celestron 9.25 for Solar Imaging
Thank you for the clarification on the h-alfa feature I MIS interpreted your reply.
The main issue I have is the focus, even before I manage to get to any Alfa feature.
In essence my question is about reaching backfocus.
As my SCT has a backfocus of 139 mm and the Quark adds an additional 99 mm with the wedge, I was wondering whether I needed to add extension tubes between the Quark and the Camera to reach the 238 mm needed.
Best Regards
The main issue I have is the focus, even before I manage to get to any Alfa feature.
In essence my question is about reaching backfocus.
As my SCT has a backfocus of 139 mm and the Quark adds an additional 99 mm with the wedge, I was wondering whether I needed to add extension tubes between the Quark and the Camera to reach the 238 mm needed.
Best Regards
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42272
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20437 times
- Been thanked: 10245 times
- Contact:
Re: SCT Celestron 9.25 for Solar Imaging
Easiest way is just to try it!fmiscio wrote: ↑Wed Apr 07, 2021 12:20 am In essence my question is about reaching backfocus.
As my SCT has a backfocus of 139 mm and the Quark adds an additional 99 mm with the wedge, I was wondering whether I needed to add extension tubes between the Quark and the Camera to reach the 238 mm needed.
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
- MalVeauX
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 1858
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:58 pm
- Location: Florida
- Has thanked: 1171 times
- Been thanked: 1360 times
Re: SCT Celestron 9.25 for Solar Imaging
Hi,
I wouldn't bother with your SCT at all for this. Whatever aperture you were going to off-axis mask to, would be 100% better realized with the same aperture refractor. An off-axis aperture masked SCT is something I would not suggest for any solar imaging at all, it exists as a convenience only frankly.
Also, it helps to get an idea of your seeing conditions before trying to use larger apertures.
Very best,
I wouldn't bother with your SCT at all for this. Whatever aperture you were going to off-axis mask to, would be 100% better realized with the same aperture refractor. An off-axis aperture masked SCT is something I would not suggest for any solar imaging at all, it exists as a convenience only frankly.
Also, it helps to get an idea of your seeing conditions before trying to use larger apertures.
Very best,
-
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 4:46 pm
- Location: France
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 2713 times
- Contact:
Re: SCT Celestron 9.25 for Solar Imaging
Hello,
A clarification there :
- if you use a telecentric system in front of the Combo Quark, you should not tilt the etalon,
- if you use no telecentric system and an off axis ERF, you should tilt the etalon.
Hope this helps
Christian Viladrich
Co-author of "Planetary Astronomy"
http://planetary-astronomy.com/
Editor of "Solar Astronomy"
http://www.astronomiesolaire.com/
Co-author of "Planetary Astronomy"
http://planetary-astronomy.com/
Editor of "Solar Astronomy"
http://www.astronomiesolaire.com/
-
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 2150
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 4:46 pm
- Location: France
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 2713 times
- Contact:
Re: SCT Celestron 9.25 for Solar Imaging
Off- axis ERF made sense a long time ago when good quality medium size refractors were not available at reasonnable price.MalVeauX wrote: ↑Wed Apr 28, 2021 12:38 pm Hi,
I wouldn't bother with your SCT at all for this. Whatever aperture you were going to off-axis mask to, would be 100% better realized with the same aperture refractor. An off-axis aperture masked SCT is something I would not suggest for any solar imaging at all, it exists as a convenience only frankly.
Also, it helps to get an idea of your seeing conditions before trying to use larger apertures.
Very best,
Christian Viladrich
Co-author of "Planetary Astronomy"
http://planetary-astronomy.com/
Editor of "Solar Astronomy"
http://www.astronomiesolaire.com/
Co-author of "Planetary Astronomy"
http://planetary-astronomy.com/
Editor of "Solar Astronomy"
http://www.astronomiesolaire.com/