Photographic Benefits of UV/IR Blocking Filter
- Christopher
- Im an EXPERT!
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2017 2:07 am
- Location: Cincinnati, OH USA
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
Photographic Benefits of UV/IR Blocking Filter
When solar photographers specify their hydrogen-alpha light path I often see a UV/IR blocking filter listed and I'm curious to know what specific benefits are derived particularly as it relates to the quality of the image (heat energy management considerations aside). Is there a placement requirement in order to achieve those benefits?
Thanks,
Thanks,
Christopher
"Our imagination is stretched to the utmost, not, as in fiction, to imagine things which are not really there, but just to comprehend those things which 'are' there.". -Feynman
"Our imagination is stretched to the utmost, not, as in fiction, to imagine things which are not really there, but just to comprehend those things which 'are' there.". -Feynman
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42269
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20424 times
- Been thanked: 10243 times
- Contact:
Re: Photographic Benefits of UV/IR Blocking Filter
Maybe it's a belt and braces approach from me - I have a few UV/IR filters I use in conjunction with solar. One sits ahead of my BF15 on my coronado 90 as there is no ERF I can see on this scope, so is predominantly the blocker (and etalon) dealing with out of band light, the UV/IR just turns back some of this energy off my blocker and will hopefully through reduced thermal cycling extend the life of my recently replaced ITF filter. I also use one ahead of my Quarks for the same reason. Currently in the process of sourcing a suitable UV/IR filter that passes CaK so I can use as a more efficient sub aperture ERF in CaK - Baader Blue doesn't let a huge amount of light through.
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
- Christopher
- Im an EXPERT!
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2017 2:07 am
- Location: Cincinnati, OH USA
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
Re: Photographic Benefits of UV/IR Blocking Filter
Hi Mark,
Thanks for responding. So it sounds like your usage is strictly for managing thermal energy. I think I understand those considerations. I'm also wondering about the impact on data collected during imaging and how that might affect the image quality (for better or worse). The PGR implementation of the IMX174, for example, has a spectral response curve from 380 to 1100nm and so is capable of registering some of the near IR energy. Assuming that energy makes it through a narrowband solar H-alpha light path (which the use of UV/IR filters would suggest is true) in measurable amounts and assuming it registers on the image histogram (also not sure) is the data of any benefit or detriment at that point in rendering an image? Stated differently, with the Baader filter eliminating data below 400 and above 700 is there any measurable data being lost and if so, what is its impact on the image?
Thanks
Thanks for responding. So it sounds like your usage is strictly for managing thermal energy. I think I understand those considerations. I'm also wondering about the impact on data collected during imaging and how that might affect the image quality (for better or worse). The PGR implementation of the IMX174, for example, has a spectral response curve from 380 to 1100nm and so is capable of registering some of the near IR energy. Assuming that energy makes it through a narrowband solar H-alpha light path (which the use of UV/IR filters would suggest is true) in measurable amounts and assuming it registers on the image histogram (also not sure) is the data of any benefit or detriment at that point in rendering an image? Stated differently, with the Baader filter eliminating data below 400 and above 700 is there any measurable data being lost and if so, what is its impact on the image?
Thanks
Christopher
"Our imagination is stretched to the utmost, not, as in fiction, to imagine things which are not really there, but just to comprehend those things which 'are' there.". -Feynman
"Our imagination is stretched to the utmost, not, as in fiction, to imagine things which are not really there, but just to comprehend those things which 'are' there.". -Feynman
- Montana
- Librarian
- Posts: 34559
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
- Location: Cheshire, UK
- Has thanked: 17666 times
- Been thanked: 8787 times
Re: Photographic Benefits of UV/IR Blocking Filter
Christopher, I always use a UV/IR filter when I image with my Solarscope. As cameras are so sensitive these days they pick up on the far infrared that many blocking filters do not block. I think the difference is extremely subtle but I get higher contrast by eliminating that far infra red. Just test and see, you will soon notice if it is a waste of time or not. Not all blocking filters are the same.
Alexandra
Alexandra
- pedro
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 12256
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 8:26 pm
- Location: Portugal
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 6575 times
- Contact:
Re: Photographic Benefits of UV/IR Blocking Filter
I also use a UV/IR all the time, WL imaging mainly. It is important to block the far infrared as Alexandra mentions
For H-alpha imaging I use a Baader 35nm or 7nm filter (fitted to the nose of the camera) that are infrared blocked as well
For H-alpha imaging I use a Baader 35nm or 7nm filter (fitted to the nose of the camera) that are infrared blocked as well
Pedro Re'
https://pedroreastrophotography.com/
https://pedroreastrophotography.com/
- robert
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 3069
- Joined: Fri Oct 14, 2011 1:49 pm
- Location: N.W.Scotland
- Has thanked: 4 times
- Been thanked: 1274 times
- Contact:
Re: Photographic Benefits of UV/IR Blocking Filter
I use a Baader UV/IR filter for Ha and it definitely cuts out a slight foggy blur from far red light getting in the camera. When I first started CaK imaging with a Lunt B600 I used it and was very disappointed until I realised that it cuts out most of the CaK line! Only a very faint blurred image left.
I replaced it with an IR cut filter and that was a massive improvement for CaK. (Stupid!)
Robert
I replaced it with an IR cut filter and that was a massive improvement for CaK. (Stupid!)
Robert
images and animations http://tinyurl.com/h5bgoso
2024 images https://www.flickr.com/photos/69734017@ ... 0313830045
2023 images https://www.flickr.com/photos/69734017@ ... 0304905278
ED80. ED100. Celestron-150mm-PST mod. C8 edge. ES127
LS60PT-LS60F-B1200. B600-Cak. PGR-Ch3-IMX265
2024 images https://www.flickr.com/photos/69734017@ ... 0313830045
2023 images https://www.flickr.com/photos/69734017@ ... 0304905278
ED80. ED100. Celestron-150mm-PST mod. C8 edge. ES127
LS60PT-LS60F-B1200. B600-Cak. PGR-Ch3-IMX265
Re: Photographic Benefits of UV/IR Blocking Filter
Do they make any difference for visual, thanks
Just for info, if I ever come over as "blunt" or upset it is not intentional, I am AUTISTIC, I have Aspergers, and ADHD, Autism, so my apologies if I ever sound, unintentionally confrontational. Thank you
Esprit 120mm triplet refractor
Celestron Evolution Edge HD 8"
72mm Ed Skywatcher for Solar
SkyTee 2
Sky-Watcher SolarQuest
Gitzo Systematic Series 5
ASI 178MM
Daystar Quark Ha
WO Binoviewers
Many eyepieces 2"
Esprit 120mm triplet refractor
Celestron Evolution Edge HD 8"
72mm Ed Skywatcher for Solar
SkyTee 2
Sky-Watcher SolarQuest
Gitzo Systematic Series 5
ASI 178MM
Daystar Quark Ha
WO Binoviewers
Many eyepieces 2"
- Montana
- Librarian
- Posts: 34559
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
- Location: Cheshire, UK
- Has thanked: 17666 times
- Been thanked: 8787 times
Re: Photographic Benefits of UV/IR Blocking Filter
Skyhawk, no, because the eye cannot register these wavelengths. Eye health? no idea?
Alexandra
Alexandra
- Bob Yoesle
- Almost There...
- Posts: 994
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:24 pm
- Has thanked: 539 times
- Been thanked: 807 times
Re: Photographic Benefits of UV/IR Blocking Filter
I have seen first hand that if something can go wrong, it will eventually actually go wrong - at least for someone. So when it comes to safety, I'm pretty conservative. I also believe there is a reason most solar telescope OEM's incorporate IR blocking as a safety AND liability issue. Here's a slide I put together for my presentations on solar observing and equipment:
From the solar irradiance at sea level curve, you can see there are potential eye health issues for both UV/IR A and UV/IR B for the cornea, lens, and retina, and this will increase proportionally with the area of the objective. Back when the aperture of H alpha systems were relatively small, the energy levels were not as significant as they are today with much larger apertures being employed, and the Macgyvered PST mods, etc. being put together. One therefore needs to take this into account with appropriate filtering, especially as telescope aperture increases. The ERFs employed by Daystar and Coronado - typically C/O/RG glasses - absorb very little IR:
Secondary IR blocking is therefore needed, and is sometimes added via IR coatings to these absorptive glasses (Lunt, BeloptiK). Even so, some OEM filters can let a bit of IR through, as seen here as out-of-focus continuum in the top image, and corrected with additional IR filtering on the bottom:
Additional IR Blocking can therefore be employed for both IR A - the typical DERF or UV/IR blocking filter, and IR B - a KG 3 type filter.
This gives me a bit of security from both an eye safety and filter longevity (ITF, etc.) perspective.
Just my 2 cents worth - as in my experience a little prevention is worth a lot of cure.
From the solar irradiance at sea level curve, you can see there are potential eye health issues for both UV/IR A and UV/IR B for the cornea, lens, and retina, and this will increase proportionally with the area of the objective. Back when the aperture of H alpha systems were relatively small, the energy levels were not as significant as they are today with much larger apertures being employed, and the Macgyvered PST mods, etc. being put together. One therefore needs to take this into account with appropriate filtering, especially as telescope aperture increases. The ERFs employed by Daystar and Coronado - typically C/O/RG glasses - absorb very little IR:
Secondary IR blocking is therefore needed, and is sometimes added via IR coatings to these absorptive glasses (Lunt, BeloptiK). Even so, some OEM filters can let a bit of IR through, as seen here as out-of-focus continuum in the top image, and corrected with additional IR filtering on the bottom:
Additional IR Blocking can therefore be employed for both IR A - the typical DERF or UV/IR blocking filter, and IR B - a KG 3 type filter.
This gives me a bit of security from both an eye safety and filter longevity (ITF, etc.) perspective.
Just my 2 cents worth - as in my experience a little prevention is worth a lot of cure.
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
Re: Photographic Benefits of UV/IR Blocking Filter
thank you
Just for info, if I ever come over as "blunt" or upset it is not intentional, I am AUTISTIC, I have Aspergers, and ADHD, Autism, so my apologies if I ever sound, unintentionally confrontational. Thank you
Esprit 120mm triplet refractor
Celestron Evolution Edge HD 8"
72mm Ed Skywatcher for Solar
SkyTee 2
Sky-Watcher SolarQuest
Gitzo Systematic Series 5
ASI 178MM
Daystar Quark Ha
WO Binoviewers
Many eyepieces 2"
Esprit 120mm triplet refractor
Celestron Evolution Edge HD 8"
72mm Ed Skywatcher for Solar
SkyTee 2
Sky-Watcher SolarQuest
Gitzo Systematic Series 5
ASI 178MM
Daystar Quark Ha
WO Binoviewers
Many eyepieces 2"
- Christopher
- Im an EXPERT!
- Posts: 221
- Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2017 2:07 am
- Location: Cincinnati, OH USA
- Has thanked: 33 times
- Been thanked: 34 times
Re: Photographic Benefits of UV/IR Blocking Filter
Thanks to all who chimed in. It has cleared some things up for me (excuse the pun ). I can see how they benefit the image through narrowing the wavelength the camera is recording. Seems that this results in better contrast and structural details. No one indicated that they found the extra data useful or desirable. Seems a 1.25" could be quite useful. There are also some configurations where a 2" would be nice too, such as when a barlow or reducer is used on the nosepiece. I see where this is going
Christopher
"Our imagination is stretched to the utmost, not, as in fiction, to imagine things which are not really there, but just to comprehend those things which 'are' there.". -Feynman
"Our imagination is stretched to the utmost, not, as in fiction, to imagine things which are not really there, but just to comprehend those things which 'are' there.". -Feynman