Tried a new technique: Barlow to Quark to Focal Reducer to Camera
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 3:44 pm
- Location: Vista, CA
- Has thanked: 141 times
- Been thanked: 240 times
- Contact:
Tried a new technique: Barlow to Quark to Focal Reducer to Camera
Per Val's encouragement, I tried a new technique: 152mm masked to 110mm to a Barlow lens (no body) on the end of the Quark then a .5 Barlow (no body) stuck on the 174 camera. While I did not like the vignetting when zoomed out, I did like the contrast when I constrained the ROI.
These are two sets of 200 frame captures in to AS3 then IMPPG then GIMP
Best,
Jack
These are two sets of 200 frame captures in to AS3 then IMPPG then GIMP
Best,
Jack
Explore Scientific 152mm f6.5 achromat
Aeries D-ERF
Quark Chromosphere f27 native, (f14 when focal reduced)
Mallincam .5x focal reducer (large format)
12nm Filter
ZWO174 (IMX249 chip 5um)
Huge Sense of Adventure Viewing Creation
Aeries D-ERF
Quark Chromosphere f27 native, (f14 when focal reduced)
Mallincam .5x focal reducer (large format)
12nm Filter
ZWO174 (IMX249 chip 5um)
Huge Sense of Adventure Viewing Creation
- MapleRidge
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 10199
- Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2012 11:58 pm
- Location: Cambray, ON Canada
- Has thanked: 64 times
- Been thanked: 4340 times
- Contact:
Re: Tried a new technique: Barlow to Quark to Focal Reducer to Camera
That combo turned out very well Jack...nicely done
Brian
Brian
Brian Colville
Maple Ridge Observatory
Cambray, ON Canada
Photos: https://www.flickr.com/photos/185395281@N08/albums
10'x15 Roll-off Roof Observatory
Takahashi EM400 Mount carrying:
C14 + Lunt 80ED
Deep Sky Work - ASI294MM Pro+EFW 7x36/Canon 60D (Ha mod), ONAG
Planetary Work - SBIG CFW10, ASI462MM
2.2m Diameter Dome
iOptron CEM70G Mount carrying:
Orion EON 130ED, f7 OTA for Day & Night Use
Ha Setup: Lunt LS80PT/LS75FHa/B1200Ha + Home Brew Lunt Double Stack/B1800Ha on the Orion OTA + Daystar Quantum
WL, G-Band & CaK Setup: Lunt Wedge & Lunt B1800CaK, Baader K-Line and Altair 2nm G-Band filter
ASI1600MM, ASI432MM, ASI294MM Pro, ASI174MM, ASI462MM
Maple Ridge Observatory
Cambray, ON Canada
Photos: https://www.flickr.com/photos/185395281@N08/albums
10'x15 Roll-off Roof Observatory
Takahashi EM400 Mount carrying:
C14 + Lunt 80ED
Deep Sky Work - ASI294MM Pro+EFW 7x36/Canon 60D (Ha mod), ONAG
Planetary Work - SBIG CFW10, ASI462MM
2.2m Diameter Dome
iOptron CEM70G Mount carrying:
Orion EON 130ED, f7 OTA for Day & Night Use
Ha Setup: Lunt LS80PT/LS75FHa/B1200Ha + Home Brew Lunt Double Stack/B1800Ha on the Orion OTA + Daystar Quantum
WL, G-Band & CaK Setup: Lunt Wedge & Lunt B1800CaK, Baader K-Line and Altair 2nm G-Band filter
ASI1600MM, ASI432MM, ASI294MM Pro, ASI174MM, ASI462MM
- JochenM
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 2839
- Joined: Tue Dec 10, 2019 2:26 pm
- Location: Belgium
- Has thanked: 1200 times
- Been thanked: 1619 times
- Contact:
Re: Tried a new technique: Barlow to Quark to Focal Reducer to Camera
Interesting setup. Nice results.
What's the idea behind using a barlow on two different positions in the optical train? Or am I just misreading that (the second one being a reducer for example)?
What's the idea behind using a barlow on two different positions in the optical train? Or am I just misreading that (the second one being a reducer for example)?
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42274
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20442 times
- Been thanked: 10248 times
- Contact:
Re: Tried a new technique: Barlow to Quark to Focal Reducer to Camera
Yup, that's definitely more contrast! Well done Jack.
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
- Montana
- Librarian
- Posts: 34563
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
- Location: Cheshire, UK
- Has thanked: 17672 times
- Been thanked: 8793 times
Re: Tried a new technique: Barlow to Quark to Focal Reducer to Camera
Yes, that is fantastic
Alexandra
Alexandra
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 3:44 pm
- Location: Vista, CA
- Has thanked: 141 times
- Been thanked: 240 times
- Contact:
Re: Tried a new technique: Barlow to Quark to Focal Reducer to Camera
Jochen,
Here are the explanations Mark and Val gave me regarding the imaging train to try.
Mark's encouragement to mask down the 152mm to a 110mm: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=27707
Here are the explanations Mark and Val gave me regarding the imaging train to try.
Mark's encouragement to mask down the 152mm to a 110mm: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=27707
Val's use of the Barlow on the Quark and the Focal Reducer on the Camera: viewtopic.php?f=4&t=27914Stopping down the scope is far from giving up. Think about, if the seeing limit is only where say 100mm of aperture is capable of to diffraction limit, viewing it with a larger aperture achieves nothing, the image you are getting is governed by seeing. The larger aperture will still show the same resolution as the smaller aperture. However there is a benefit here of running smaller aperture, the quark is now presented with a much longer focal ratio, and longer focal ratio is a tighter bandpass, and this in turn is more image contrast. Then all of a sudden the detail in the image is easier to see, easier for the stacking software to handle and easier to post process with less influence of image noise.
I would make 2 masks, a 100mm and a 125mm, and try them both against full aperture, I think you'll be surprised!
Jack,
Yes, these two are the essential parts of my imaging train. Additional barlow on the Quark's nose increases the F/D making the light cone less steep. This narrows the bandwidth of the etalon = higher contrast and more uniform illumination in the FOV. Then a focal reducer (I do use reducers from 0,8x to 0.5x) helps to optimize sampling on the camera chip (scale optimisation).
Of couse, it is possible to not use a barlow lens on the Quark nose and reducer on the camera But in this case Quark's etalon will work at wider light cone and it's working bandwidth will be wider and image contrast will be lower.
For prominences imaging I usually do not use a barlow on the Quark nose but do use a focal reducer.
Hope this helps.
Valery
Explore Scientific 152mm f6.5 achromat
Aeries D-ERF
Quark Chromosphere f27 native, (f14 when focal reduced)
Mallincam .5x focal reducer (large format)
12nm Filter
ZWO174 (IMX249 chip 5um)
Huge Sense of Adventure Viewing Creation
Aeries D-ERF
Quark Chromosphere f27 native, (f14 when focal reduced)
Mallincam .5x focal reducer (large format)
12nm Filter
ZWO174 (IMX249 chip 5um)
Huge Sense of Adventure Viewing Creation
-
- Im an EXPERT!
- Posts: 429
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2020 9:25 pm
- Location: Austin Texas
- Has thanked: 146 times
- Been thanked: 277 times
Re: Tried a new technique: Barlow to Quark to Focal Reducer to Camera
Probably a basic question, but can someone explain why the longer focal length , and more gentle light cone creates a more narrow bandwidth at the etalon?
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 3:44 pm
- Location: Vista, CA
- Has thanked: 141 times
- Been thanked: 240 times
- Contact:
Re: Tried a new technique: Barlow to Quark to Focal Reducer to Camera
That would not be me!
Explore Scientific 152mm f6.5 achromat
Aeries D-ERF
Quark Chromosphere f27 native, (f14 when focal reduced)
Mallincam .5x focal reducer (large format)
12nm Filter
ZWO174 (IMX249 chip 5um)
Huge Sense of Adventure Viewing Creation
Aeries D-ERF
Quark Chromosphere f27 native, (f14 when focal reduced)
Mallincam .5x focal reducer (large format)
12nm Filter
ZWO174 (IMX249 chip 5um)
Huge Sense of Adventure Viewing Creation
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42274
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20442 times
- Been thanked: 10248 times
- Contact:
Re: Tried a new technique: Barlow to Quark to Focal Reducer to Camera
Have a read from page 17 onwards (diagram page 18) of the daystar white paper. http://www.daystarfilters.com/Quantum/QPEPaperPro.pdf
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
- Radon86
- Almost There...
- Posts: 779
- Joined: Sat Mar 23, 2019 10:05 pm
- Has thanked: 745 times
- Been thanked: 660 times
Re: Tried a new technique: Barlow to Quark to Focal Reducer to Camera
Nice work, Jack ! Lovely detailed and high contrast images of the plasma !
I wonder the following though:
1) what is the magnifying barlow (x2 or x3 or something else)
2) where is your UV/IR filter (heat); is it a front ERF or a 2 inch uv/ir cut filter somewhere in the imaging train
3) what is the stop aperture made of ? cardboard ? plastic. Does it matter because it may affect the optical quality of the telescope.
Has anyone managed a decent variable aperture stop, something like a camera lens; its difficult to make good aperture stops from cardboard or paper.
If I can switch to a straight through imaging train, and can convince myself to upgrade my setup (mount, camera, telescope, even h-alpha filter), I will probably buy a 100mm aperture telescope, maybe an ED scope because it has a better focuser already, and can be used for night time work as well !
Thanks.
Magnus
I wonder the following though:
1) what is the magnifying barlow (x2 or x3 or something else)
2) where is your UV/IR filter (heat); is it a front ERF or a 2 inch uv/ir cut filter somewhere in the imaging train
3) what is the stop aperture made of ? cardboard ? plastic. Does it matter because it may affect the optical quality of the telescope.
Has anyone managed a decent variable aperture stop, something like a camera lens; its difficult to make good aperture stops from cardboard or paper.
If I can switch to a straight through imaging train, and can convince myself to upgrade my setup (mount, camera, telescope, even h-alpha filter), I will probably buy a 100mm aperture telescope, maybe an ED scope because it has a better focuser already, and can be used for night time work as well !
Thanks.
Magnus
Solar: H-alpha": Quark Chromosphere filter; Baader white light filters
Scopes: Altair Astro Travel ED70mm (F 420mm, D=70mm);; Skywatcher 90mm (F 910mm D=90mm); GSO focuser;;Altair Astro 60mm guidescope (D=60mm,F=225mm)
Cameras: ASI120mm-S,ASI174mm
Mount: SW HEQ5 Pro, SW EQ3 Pro Synscan (SW = Skywatcher),Vixen Polarie tracker (portable setup)
Accessory: SW Auto-focuser
Scopes: Altair Astro Travel ED70mm (F 420mm, D=70mm);; Skywatcher 90mm (F 910mm D=90mm); GSO focuser;;Altair Astro 60mm guidescope (D=60mm,F=225mm)
Cameras: ASI120mm-S,ASI174mm
Mount: SW HEQ5 Pro, SW EQ3 Pro Synscan (SW = Skywatcher),Vixen Polarie tracker (portable setup)
Accessory: SW Auto-focuser
- marios i.
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 1727
- Joined: Sun Nov 09, 2014 8:38 am
- Location: Cyprus-Nicosia-Mammari
- Has thanked: 1707 times
- Been thanked: 1125 times
Re: Tried a new technique: Barlow to Quark to Focal Reducer to Camera
Nice result!
Marios S.Ioannou
My Gallery https://www.flickr.com/photos/195609307@N07/albums
Sketcher/Visual Observer
My Gallery https://www.flickr.com/photos/195609307@N07/albums
Sketcher/Visual Observer
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 783
- Joined: Tue Feb 03, 2015 3:44 pm
- Location: Vista, CA
- Has thanked: 141 times
- Been thanked: 240 times
- Contact:
Re: Tried a new technique: Barlow to Quark to Focal Reducer to Camera
Magnus,
I also have an ED 80mm Orion and it produces very nice images as well. Perhaps I will do some more experimenting with that one though it is a fast focal ratio.
Regarding your questions:
Cheers,
Jack
I also have an ED 80mm Orion and it produces very nice images as well. Perhaps I will do some more experimenting with that one though it is a fast focal ratio.
Regarding your questions:
The Barlow is a 2x though since I am not using it in it's normal body, it is likely a bit less? Same with the focal reducer which is normally a .5 (but again, is without it's body). I uses a full aperture Aeries DERF, but I also use a 12nm CCD filter on the camera to minimize any more potential glare and stray light. The aperture mask is thick paper mounted on a metal "lazy susan" hub I found which sits perfectly on the OTA, but it looks really ungainly. .I wonder the following though:
1) what is the magnifying barlow (x2 or x3 or something else)
2) where is your UV/IR filter (heat); is it a front ERF or a 2 inch uv/ir cut filter somewhere in the imaging train
3) what is the stop aperture made of ? cardboard ? plastic. Does it matter because it may affect the optical quality of the telescope.
Has anyone managed a decent variable aperture stop, something like a camera lens; its difficult to make good aperture stops from cardboard or paper.
Cheers,
Jack
Explore Scientific 152mm f6.5 achromat
Aeries D-ERF
Quark Chromosphere f27 native, (f14 when focal reduced)
Mallincam .5x focal reducer (large format)
12nm Filter
ZWO174 (IMX249 chip 5um)
Huge Sense of Adventure Viewing Creation
Aeries D-ERF
Quark Chromosphere f27 native, (f14 when focal reduced)
Mallincam .5x focal reducer (large format)
12nm Filter
ZWO174 (IMX249 chip 5um)
Huge Sense of Adventure Viewing Creation
-
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 1668
- Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2019 6:44 pm
- Location: Germany
- Has thanked: 2978 times
- Been thanked: 2082 times
Re: Tried a new technique: Barlow to Quark to Focal Reducer to Camera
If i understand correctly one can use a non telecentric barlow in front of the quark telecentric to improve contrast of the etalon?
Im wondering if that is the case with all barlows / glaspath correctors or does the design of the "front barlow" matter too?
I experimented with this on my 150mm f/8 sw ac with a 1.6x glaspath corrector in front of the quark and the daystar reducer after the etalon.
So at the etalon i was aprox at f/55 and at the camera at around half of it (reduced). Still i didnt notice a "extreme" increase of contrast from f/34 to f/55. But i didnt document the comparison.
Im wondering if that is the case with all barlows / glaspath correctors or does the design of the "front barlow" matter too?
I experimented with this on my 150mm f/8 sw ac with a 1.6x glaspath corrector in front of the quark and the daystar reducer after the etalon.
So at the etalon i was aprox at f/55 and at the camera at around half of it (reduced). Still i didnt notice a "extreme" increase of contrast from f/34 to f/55. But i didnt document the comparison.
Triband C9.25
H-a: Quark Chromosphere with BF mod
WL: Antlia 500nm/ 3nm, 393 nm/ 3nm
Ca-K: homebrew (includes 2x 1.5A filters, thanks Apollo)
Player One Apollo Max + Mars MII
Barlows:
-2x Gerd Düring 2.7x
-2x TMB 1.8x
H-a: Quark Chromosphere with BF mod
WL: Antlia 500nm/ 3nm, 393 nm/ 3nm
Ca-K: homebrew (includes 2x 1.5A filters, thanks Apollo)
Player One Apollo Max + Mars MII
Barlows:
-2x Gerd Düring 2.7x
-2x TMB 1.8x
- ffellah
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 11172
- Joined: Mon Oct 27, 2014 6:46 pm
- Location: Westport, CT USA
- Has thanked: 9145 times
- Been thanked: 6026 times
- MAURITS
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 8507
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 4:37 pm
- Location: Belgium
- Has thanked: 2412 times
- Been thanked: 4787 times
- Contact:
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42274
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20442 times
- Been thanked: 10248 times
- Contact:
Re: Tried a new technique: Barlow to Quark to Focal Reducer to Camera
The actual f-ratios are best determined by image scale. A barlow, or a reducer only work at the advertised spec if they are used in certain conditions / spacings which the barlow manufacturer won't specify.Dennis wrote: ↑Wed Mar 30, 2022 10:32 am If i understand correctly one can use a non telecentric barlow in front of the quark telecentric to improve contrast of the etalon?
Im wondering if that is the case with all barlows / glaspath correctors or does the design of the "front barlow" matter too?
I experimented with this on my 150mm f/8 sw ac with a 1.6x glaspath corrector in front of the quark and the daystar reducer after the etalon.
So at the etalon i was aprox at f/55 and at the camera at around half of it (reduced). Still i didnt notice a "extreme" increase of contrast from f/34 to f/55. But i didnt document the comparison.
You're quark will work just fine at the native f8, ditch the glasspath in infront of the quark.
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!