July 27 2021 - New camera same sensor
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 5:43 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 1986 times
July 27 2021 - New camera same sensor
I got fed up of my crumbling ASI174MM which seems to just get worse and worse as the weeks go on, so I decided to replace it with the QHY version, the QHY5III-174 Mono. Yeah yeah, i know, its the same sensor, BUT it actually worked better!! I dont mean cuz its a new camera. The issues ive had with horizontal banding does not show up on the QHY version, also the noise is way less compared to the ASI174MM. I also managed to gain an increase in frame rate from 75fps to 85fps. I did some sample shots so you can all take a look.
So here is an 8bit vs 16bit comparison as well
8 bit at 138fps 2000 frames best of 20% 16 bit at 85fps 2000 frames best of 20% Im really happy with the results of the camera and wonder why not so many people use it and why i havent tried it sooner. I seriously think its a lot cleaner than the ASI174MM.
So here is an 8bit vs 16bit comparison as well
8 bit at 138fps 2000 frames best of 20% 16 bit at 85fps 2000 frames best of 20% Im really happy with the results of the camera and wonder why not so many people use it and why i havent tried it sooner. I seriously think its a lot cleaner than the ASI174MM.
- minhlead
- Almost There...
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2021 9:36 pm
- Location: Ha Noi, Vietnam
- Has thanked: 739 times
- Been thanked: 1107 times
- Contact:
Re: July 27 2021 - New camera same sensor
Great shots Simon. And your seeing is really good base on your Sharpcap screen cap.
Also, from my personal experience, ASI tends to fare better on the software side of things.
QHY's driver is a nightmare. Everytime I update the driver I have to cross the fingers just to pray for not having anything breaks. But most of the time, something breaks anyway. Maybe it's the cooler, maybe it's the frame speed or perhasp it's the binning. QHY's driver guy does not seem to know what he is doing.
So if you have a QHY camera and everything is working as expected then do your self a favour and do not update that driver.
Also, from my personal experience, ASI tends to fare better on the software side of things.
QHY's driver is a nightmare. Everytime I update the driver I have to cross the fingers just to pray for not having anything breaks. But most of the time, something breaks anyway. Maybe it's the cooler, maybe it's the frame speed or perhasp it's the binning. QHY's driver guy does not seem to know what he is doing.
So if you have a QHY camera and everything is working as expected then do your self a favour and do not update that driver.
Minh.
Loves from Viet Nam <3
My gear:
Scope: SkyRover (Kunming Optics) 152mm F/6 Doublets
Mount: JTW Tridents GTR
Camera:
PlayerOne Apollo M-Max
Quark Chromosphere Doublestacked with PST etalon
Loves from Viet Nam <3
My gear:
Scope: SkyRover (Kunming Optics) 152mm F/6 Doublets
Mount: JTW Tridents GTR
Camera:
PlayerOne Apollo M-Max
Quark Chromosphere Doublestacked with PST etalon
- eroel
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 9444
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 10:45 pm
- Location: México D.F.
- Been thanked: 4980 times
- Montana
- Librarian
- Posts: 34722
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
- Location: Cheshire, UK
- Has thanked: 17974 times
- Been thanked: 8906 times
Re: July 27 2021 - New camera same sensor
Excellent results yes, my ASI174 is very noisy, if I had known (people had spoken about it) I wouldn't have bought that version. I'm stuck with it now
Alexandra
Alexandra
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42545
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20813 times
- Been thanked: 10484 times
- Contact:
Re: July 27 2021 - New camera same sensor
Nice shots Simon and glad you're pleased with the new camera!
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 5:43 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 1986 times
Re: July 27 2021 - New camera same sensor
Funny you mentioned drivers, they got a lot better. I tried with the version i had vs the newest version and the newer driver was nice and stable.
I admit that QHY drivers have been questionable over the years but they really have gotten their act together. ZWO also gives source code to the software makers to help out and QHY has recently started to release SDK. A lot of software makers just groan at the fact that there is another set of instructions to program so they tend not to bother and rely on ASCOM which gets passed back to the camera makers.
Player One Cameras have recently gotten ahead of ZWO in software since the original dev team where from ZWO. Their main focus is astro and science is secondary.
I've harped on QHYs case for months and month and they are starting to listen to all of us and make a huge effort. Lets just hope its up from here.
I admit that QHY drivers have been questionable over the years but they really have gotten their act together. ZWO also gives source code to the software makers to help out and QHY has recently started to release SDK. A lot of software makers just groan at the fact that there is another set of instructions to program so they tend not to bother and rely on ASCOM which gets passed back to the camera makers.
Player One Cameras have recently gotten ahead of ZWO in software since the original dev team where from ZWO. Their main focus is astro and science is secondary.
I've harped on QHYs case for months and month and they are starting to listen to all of us and make a huge effort. Lets just hope its up from here.
minhlead wrote: ↑Tue Jul 27, 2021 11:59 pm Great shots Simon. And your seeing is really good base on your Sharpcap screen cap.
Also, from my personal experience, ASI tends to fare better on the software side of things.
QHY's driver is a nightmare. Everytime I update the driver I have to cross the fingers just to pray for not having anything breaks. But most of the time, something breaks anyway. Maybe it's the cooler, maybe it's the frame speed or perhasp it's the binning. QHY's driver guy does not seem to know what he is doing.
So if you have a QHY camera and everything is working as expected then do your self a favour and do not update that driver.
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 5:43 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 1986 times
Re: July 27 2021 - New camera same sensor
Believe me i wasnt ready for the difference. Speaking of which, check out the new post i made
- DeepSolar64
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 19064
- Joined: Thu Sep 05, 2019 12:19 am
- Location: Lowndesville S.C.
- Has thanked: 17849 times
- Been thanked: 16992 times
Re: July 27 2021 - New camera same sensor
Very nice results, Simon, but again I always enjoy your work.
Lunt 8x32 SUNoculars
Orion 70mm Solar Telescope
Celestron AstroMaster Alt/Az Mount
Meade Coronado SolarMax II 60 DS
Meade Coronado SolarMax II 90 DS
Meade Coronado AZS Alt/Az Mount
Astro-Tech AT72EDII with Altair solar wedge
Celestron NexStar 102GT with Altair solar wedge
Losmandy AZ8 Alt/Az Mount
Sky-Watcher AZGTI Alt-Az GoTo mount
Cameras: ZWO ASI178MM, PGR Grasshopper, PGR Flea
Lunt, Coronado, TeleVue, Orion and Meade eyepieces
Visual Observer
" Way more fun to see it! "
Orion 70mm Solar Telescope
Celestron AstroMaster Alt/Az Mount
Meade Coronado SolarMax II 60 DS
Meade Coronado SolarMax II 90 DS
Meade Coronado AZS Alt/Az Mount
Astro-Tech AT72EDII with Altair solar wedge
Celestron NexStar 102GT with Altair solar wedge
Losmandy AZ8 Alt/Az Mount
Sky-Watcher AZGTI Alt-Az GoTo mount
Cameras: ZWO ASI178MM, PGR Grasshopper, PGR Flea
Lunt, Coronado, TeleVue, Orion and Meade eyepieces
Visual Observer
" Way more fun to see it! "
- minhlead
- Almost There...
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2021 9:36 pm
- Location: Ha Noi, Vietnam
- Has thanked: 739 times
- Been thanked: 1107 times
- Contact:
Re: July 27 2021 - New camera same sensor
Well it depends on whether your camera is newly released or not. The newly released camera is extremely unstable and buggy. I used qhy163, 294, and play with a 16200 for a while and they all exhibit the same buggy driver the few months after release, they release an update to fix a bug just to have another coming up. After the dev decided to leave that particular model alone then it's stable.Simon2940 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 29, 2021 1:10 am Funny you mentioned drivers, they got a lot better. I tried with the version i had vs the newest version and the newer driver was nice and stable.
I admit that QHY drivers have been questionable over the years but they really have gotten their act together. ZWO also gives source code to the software makers to help out and QHY has recently started to release SDK. A lot of software makers just groan at the fact that there is another set of instructions to program so they tend not to bother and rely on ASCOM which gets passed back to the camera makers.
Player One Cameras have recently gotten ahead of ZWO in software since the original dev team where from ZWO. Their main focus is astro and science is secondary.
I've harped on QHYs case for months and month and they are starting to listen to all of us and make a huge effort. Lets just hope its up from here
Minh.
Loves from Viet Nam <3
My gear:
Scope: SkyRover (Kunming Optics) 152mm F/6 Doublets
Mount: JTW Tridents GTR
Camera:
PlayerOne Apollo M-Max
Quark Chromosphere Doublestacked with PST etalon
Loves from Viet Nam <3
My gear:
Scope: SkyRover (Kunming Optics) 152mm F/6 Doublets
Mount: JTW Tridents GTR
Camera:
PlayerOne Apollo M-Max
Quark Chromosphere Doublestacked with PST etalon
- MAURITS
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 8615
- Joined: Tue Nov 27, 2018 4:37 pm
- Location: Belgium
- Has thanked: 2464 times
- Been thanked: 4880 times
- Contact:
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 5:43 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 1986 times
Re: July 27 2021 - New camera same sensor
Out of interest, are you using the ASCOM drivers or the native drivers on those cameras? I have the 268M and found that the USB cable makes a difference. I have a longer one that doesnt always work, but the one in the box works every time. The other cable I have is 15ft which im suspecting that the length is the questionable part as I have other devices that have question performance. Example being an SSD drive, when i use a cable over 3ft, i dont get high transfer speeds but when i use the tiny 6" cable, i get the max rating.
minhlead wrote: ↑Thu Jul 29, 2021 5:11 amWell it depends on whether your camera is newly released or not. The newly released camera is extremely unstable and buggy. I used qhy163, 294, and play with a 16200 for a while and they all exhibit the same buggy driver the few months after release, they release an update to fix a bug just to have another coming up. After the dev decided to leave that particular model alone then it's stable.Simon2940 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 29, 2021 1:10 am Funny you mentioned drivers, they got a lot better. I tried with the version i had vs the newest version and the newer driver was nice and stable.
I admit that QHY drivers have been questionable over the years but they really have gotten their act together. ZWO also gives source code to the software makers to help out and QHY has recently started to release SDK. A lot of software makers just groan at the fact that there is another set of instructions to program so they tend not to bother and rely on ASCOM which gets passed back to the camera makers.
Player One Cameras have recently gotten ahead of ZWO in software since the original dev team where from ZWO. Their main focus is astro and science is secondary.
I've harped on QHYs case for months and month and they are starting to listen to all of us and make a huge effort. Lets just hope its up from here
-
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 6871
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 4:45 pm
- Location: Essex, S.E.England
- Been thanked: 4900 times
Re: July 27 2021 - New camera same sensor
Excellent set of captures Simon.
Quite impressive and with fine detail..
Thanks for sharing
Terry
Quite impressive and with fine detail..
Thanks for sharing
Terry
- minhlead
- Almost There...
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2021 9:36 pm
- Location: Ha Noi, Vietnam
- Has thanked: 739 times
- Been thanked: 1107 times
- Contact:
Re: July 27 2021 - New camera same sensor
I use native driver. QHY's ASCOM driver are trash. I got about 2-3 fps with ASCOM driver while 16 fps with native driver ( same res).Simon2940 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 29, 2021 5:24 pm Out of interest, are you using the ASCOM drivers or the native drivers on those cameras? I have the 268M and found that the USB cable makes a difference. I have a longer one that doesnt always work, but the one in the box works every time. The other cable I have is 15ft which im suspecting that the length is the questionable part as I have other devices that have question performance. Example being an SSD drive, when i use a cable over 3ft, i dont get high transfer speeds but when i use the tiny 6" cable, i get the max rating.
And yes, usb cable can make huge differences. Theoretical max length of the USB 3.0/3.1 (which is used on most QHY/ASI camera) is 3m (about 10 feet) (and the limit is 1m -3 feet with USB 3.1 gen 2 which seems to be the case with your SSD) . Any longer than that and you need a repeater or powered cable. So keep the length limited or get a powered hub.
Minh.
Loves from Viet Nam <3
My gear:
Scope: SkyRover (Kunming Optics) 152mm F/6 Doublets
Mount: JTW Tridents GTR
Camera:
PlayerOne Apollo M-Max
Quark Chromosphere Doublestacked with PST etalon
Loves from Viet Nam <3
My gear:
Scope: SkyRover (Kunming Optics) 152mm F/6 Doublets
Mount: JTW Tridents GTR
Camera:
PlayerOne Apollo M-Max
Quark Chromosphere Doublestacked with PST etalon
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 5:43 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 1986 times
Re: July 27 2021 - New camera same sensor
Thats really odd that your getting such bad numbers, i've had no issues with native drivers and getting high frames rates. I know that ASCOM has much lower rates since there is no direct command to access or utilize the DDR buffer but i dont think that is a direct fault with the camera or driver, more a limitation with ASCOM in general. Even on my ZWO cameras using ASCOM i never get more than 3 or 4 fps at best.
Im going to look into this, is this issue specific to the 294 or did you get the same issues with other QHY cameras?
Im going to look into this, is this issue specific to the 294 or did you get the same issues with other QHY cameras?
minhlead wrote: ↑Thu Jul 29, 2021 11:08 pmI use native driver. QHY's ASCOM driver are trash. I got about 2-3 fps with ASCOM driver while 16 fps with native driver ( same res).Simon2940 wrote: ↑Thu Jul 29, 2021 5:24 pm Out of interest, are you using the ASCOM drivers or the native drivers on those cameras? I have the 268M and found that the USB cable makes a difference. I have a longer one that doesnt always work, but the one in the box works every time. The other cable I have is 15ft which im suspecting that the length is the questionable part as I have other devices that have question performance. Example being an SSD drive, when i use a cable over 3ft, i dont get high transfer speeds but when i use the tiny 6" cable, i get the max rating.
And yes, usb cable can make huge differences. Theoretical max length of the USB 3.0/3.1 (which is used on most QHY/ASI camera) is 3m (about 10 feet) (and the limit is 1m -3 feet with USB 3.1 gen 2 which seems to be the case with your SSD) . Any longer than that and you need a repeater or powered cable. So keep the length limited or get a powered hub.
- davidem27
- Ohhhhhh My!
- Posts: 148
- Joined: Mon May 10, 2021 10:06 am
- Location: Southern Italy
- Has thanked: 81 times
- Been thanked: 247 times
Re: July 27 2021 - New camera same sensor
Hey Simon,
talking about ZWO tilter: does it solve to you Newtonian's rings?
My full disk captures suffer of them and I did not figure out with ZWO tilter...
talking about ZWO tilter: does it solve to you Newtonian's rings?
My full disk captures suffer of them and I did not figure out with ZWO tilter...
White light: Skywatcher 120 ED and Borg 76 ED with Baader Herschel Wedge and filters
H-alpha: Lunt LS50T Ha BF600, 120 ED modified by Lunt etalon. Thousand Oaks 0.9 Å Prominance filter
Calcium II K: Lunt B1200
www.volpetta.com
We are curious. We need equipment, we need seeing, we need time
H-alpha: Lunt LS50T Ha BF600, 120 ED modified by Lunt etalon. Thousand Oaks 0.9 Å Prominance filter
Calcium II K: Lunt B1200
www.volpetta.com
We are curious. We need equipment, we need seeing, we need time
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 5:43 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 1986 times
Re: July 27 2021 - New camera same sensor
It works for me, and doesnt work for others. The actual trick is to rotate the camera or blocker around until it starts to fade off. Your camera may not be in the dead center of the optical path so rotating the camera can make a difference. Set the tilter to its default position before doing so.
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 5:43 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 1986 times
Re: July 27 2021 - New camera same sensor
Ive never used one before, the closest is the FLIR versions but those cameras are more geared for industrial applications so the software and drivers are not specifically suited for what we do. I believe Alan Friedman uses that camera with great results. Probably best to ask him until i can get my hands on one.
- minhlead
- Almost There...
- Posts: 684
- Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2021 9:36 pm
- Location: Ha Noi, Vietnam
- Has thanked: 739 times
- Been thanked: 1107 times
- Contact:
Re: July 27 2021 - New camera same sensor
I do not really know. I have never used the QHY163 for hi frame rate application. And I have not tried ascom driver with my qhy294c lately but a few time that I did when I first purchased it at the end of 2019 then this is the caseSimon2940 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 5:03 pm Thats really odd that your getting such bad numbers, i've had no issues with native drivers and getting high frames rates. I know that ASCOM has much lower rates since there is no direct command to access or utilize the DDR buffer but i dont think that is a direct fault with the camera or driver, more a limitation with ASCOM in general. Even on my ZWO cameras using ASCOM i never get more than 3 or 4 fps at best.
Im going to look into this, is this issue specific to the 294 or did you get the same issues with other QHY cameras?
Minh.
Loves from Viet Nam <3
My gear:
Scope: SkyRover (Kunming Optics) 152mm F/6 Doublets
Mount: JTW Tridents GTR
Camera:
PlayerOne Apollo M-Max
Quark Chromosphere Doublestacked with PST etalon
Loves from Viet Nam <3
My gear:
Scope: SkyRover (Kunming Optics) 152mm F/6 Doublets
Mount: JTW Tridents GTR
Camera:
PlayerOne Apollo M-Max
Quark Chromosphere Doublestacked with PST etalon
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 606
- Joined: Thu Feb 25, 2021 5:43 pm
- Has thanked: 1075 times
- Been thanked: 1986 times
Re: July 27 2021 - New camera same sensor
If i find something, I will let you know. I really want everyone to be able to have choice and not be tided to any one specific camera for a specific purpose.
minhlead wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 10:40 pmI do not really know. I have never used the QHY163 for hi frame rate application. And I have not tried ascom driver with my qhy294c lately but a few time that I did when I first purchased it at the end of 2019 then this is the caseSimon2940 wrote: ↑Fri Jul 30, 2021 5:03 pm Thats really odd that your getting such bad numbers, i've had no issues with native drivers and getting high frames rates. I know that ASCOM has much lower rates since there is no direct command to access or utilize the DDR buffer but i dont think that is a direct fault with the camera or driver, more a limitation with ASCOM in general. Even on my ZWO cameras using ASCOM i never get more than 3 or 4 fps at best.
Im going to look into this, is this issue specific to the 294 or did you get the same issues with other QHY cameras?
- Carbon60
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 14312
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:33 pm
- Location: Lancashire, UK
- Has thanked: 8558 times
- Been thanked: 8290 times
Re: July 27 2021 - New camera same sensor
An interesting thread, Simon, and nice comparison.
Stu.
Stu.
H-alpha, WL and Ca II K imaging kit for various image scales.
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence).
Radio meteor detector.
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence).
Radio meteor detector.
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/