Autostakkert and Avistack win hands down. I tried to use the same parameters for each file.
Chris:You will find Autostakkert superior in two regards over avistack. One, the registration over the entire field is much better with far less blurry areas. Second the amount of noise in the final image stack for the same settings is tons better. I get a grainy mess when I set avistack to best 1% of 2000 images. Autostakkert is smooth and can take much more processing without the extra "granulation" so to speak...
*****************************
Another test with 250 stacked images (out of 1000).
It does a great job really
My impressions so far are that Autostakkert is the best program for aligning and stacking (WL).
Software: Registax- AVIstack -AS!2 Comparison (Pedro)
Moderator: marktownley
- Merlin66
- Librarian
- Posts: 3972
- Joined: Tue Dec 13, 2011 1:23 pm
- Location: Junortoun, Australia
- Has thanked: 174 times
- Been thanked: 619 times
- Contact:
Software: Registax- AVIstack -AS!2 Comparison (Pedro)
"Astronomical Spectroscopy - The Final Frontier" - to boldly go where few amateurs have gone before
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer
https://groups.io/g/astronomicalspectroscopy
http://astronomicalspectroscopy.com
"Astronomical Spectroscopy for Amateurs" and
"Imaging Sunlight - using a digital spectroheliograph" - Springer