CaK imaging with different aperture masks
Moderator: marktownley
- arnedanielsen
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 7497
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:42 pm
- Location: Vestby, Norway
- Has thanked: 6305 times
- Been thanked: 7324 times
CaK imaging with different aperture masks
Dear all,
Following up on Mark’s excellent suggestion to stop-down my William Optics ZenithStar 61II for CaK imaging I got a good excuse to buy a 3D-printer for creating different aperture masks . After having designed and printed 3 different masks (40, 46 and 50mm) I did a back-to-back test earlier this week.
The seeing was quite decent in the afternoon and the conditions quite stable. The setup being used was the William Optics Zenithstar 61II equipped with a 2” Lunt CaK B1200 Straight Trough module and a ZWO ASI178MM. Everything mounted on a SkyWatcher HelioFind mount. I focused using the 40mm aperture filter and immediately noticed how much easier it was to find focus with the aperture mask compared to using full-aperture. I did not refocus between the recordings.
I did one 30s recording for each of the aperture mask plus one with no mask (full aperture) using the same camera settings of Gain=0, HighSpeed=on, Gamma=off and ROI=1800x1800. The shutter of course needed to be adjusted for the different apertures (40mm = 1.30ms, 46mm=1.00ms, 50mm=0,85ms and full aperture=0.60ms) to keep the histogram similar. This gave an FPS of 70 and 2100 frames for each recording.
I then stacked the best 20% (420 of 2100) using AutoStakkert before sharpening the images in ImPPG using the exact same parameters. No other image-processing.
Here’s a cropped section from each of the resulting image. As well as the full size images. Stopping down certainly helps for this scope for this type of imaging. Both the 40mm and the 46mm looks really good (not sure which one I prefer), but the sweet spot looks to be around this area.
Best regards,
Arne
Following up on Mark’s excellent suggestion to stop-down my William Optics ZenithStar 61II for CaK imaging I got a good excuse to buy a 3D-printer for creating different aperture masks . After having designed and printed 3 different masks (40, 46 and 50mm) I did a back-to-back test earlier this week.
The seeing was quite decent in the afternoon and the conditions quite stable. The setup being used was the William Optics Zenithstar 61II equipped with a 2” Lunt CaK B1200 Straight Trough module and a ZWO ASI178MM. Everything mounted on a SkyWatcher HelioFind mount. I focused using the 40mm aperture filter and immediately noticed how much easier it was to find focus with the aperture mask compared to using full-aperture. I did not refocus between the recordings.
I did one 30s recording for each of the aperture mask plus one with no mask (full aperture) using the same camera settings of Gain=0, HighSpeed=on, Gamma=off and ROI=1800x1800. The shutter of course needed to be adjusted for the different apertures (40mm = 1.30ms, 46mm=1.00ms, 50mm=0,85ms and full aperture=0.60ms) to keep the histogram similar. This gave an FPS of 70 and 2100 frames for each recording.
I then stacked the best 20% (420 of 2100) using AutoStakkert before sharpening the images in ImPPG using the exact same parameters. No other image-processing.
Here’s a cropped section from each of the resulting image. As well as the full size images. Stopping down certainly helps for this scope for this type of imaging. Both the 40mm and the 46mm looks really good (not sure which one I prefer), but the sweet spot looks to be around this area.
Best regards,
Arne
- Bob Yoesle
- Almost There...
- Posts: 996
- Joined: Thu Mar 08, 2012 7:24 pm
- Has thanked: 541 times
- Been thanked: 811 times
Re: CaK imaging with different aperture masks
Excellent comparison Arne!
The next step might include re-spacing the objective to optimize spherochromatic aberration, and see the effect of f-ratio on contrast performance.
The next step might include re-spacing the objective to optimize spherochromatic aberration, and see the effect of f-ratio on contrast performance.
Diagonally parked in a parallel universe.
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
Curiosity is the father of knowledge; uncertainty is the mother of wisdom.
Dark-Sky Defenders
Goldendale Observatory
- Stardust5858
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 1500
- Joined: Tue Oct 29, 2019 11:44 am
- Has thanked: 803 times
- Been thanked: 1182 times
Re: CaK imaging with different aperture masks
That's brilliant Arne, thanks for the comparisons. I do think the 40mm mask is the better image.
10ft x 6ft Solar RoR with Warm Room
Lunt 60mm Double Stack HA
80ed WL+ Lunt Hershal Wedge + Badder K-Line filter.
100mm AR + Lunt b1800 Ca-K module.
Neq6 Eq Mount.
2.7m Pulsar Dome.
11in Celestron SCT + White Light Filter.
70mm AR Stellavue.
12inch OO Newtonian.
Eq8 r Pro Mount.
Lunt 60mm Double Stack HA
80ed WL+ Lunt Hershal Wedge + Badder K-Line filter.
100mm AR + Lunt b1800 Ca-K module.
Neq6 Eq Mount.
2.7m Pulsar Dome.
11in Celestron SCT + White Light Filter.
70mm AR Stellavue.
12inch OO Newtonian.
Eq8 r Pro Mount.
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:13 pm
- Location: London, England
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 1525 times
Re: CaK imaging with different aperture masks
Really nice comparison! Interestingly, I believe the CaK PST is 40mm f10. I think your best image is the 40mm f9. Maybe those Coronado guys knew what they were doing.
- p_zetner
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:59 pm
- Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Has thanked: 166 times
- Been thanked: 719 times
Re: CaK imaging with different aperture masks
An impressive study, Arne.
Stopping down to 40mm makes a stunning difference.
Bob’s suggestion might be a good one to try and improve resolving power with the wide open objective.
Cheers.
Peter
Stopping down to 40mm makes a stunning difference.
Bob’s suggestion might be a good one to try and improve resolving power with the wide open objective.
Cheers.
Peter
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:13 pm
- Location: London, England
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 1525 times
Re: CaK imaging with different aperture masks
I'm also curious how much of the effect is due to reduction of aperture vs f-ratio (angle of the light on the filter).
- eroel
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 9444
- Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 10:45 pm
- Location: México D.F.
- Been thanked: 4980 times
Re: CaK imaging with different aperture masks
Arne:
A very clear information and comparison.
Beautiful made different aperture masks.
Best regards.
Eric.
A very clear information and comparison.
Beautiful made different aperture masks.
Best regards.
Eric.
- H-Alpha
- Almost There...
- Posts: 598
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2021 2:19 am
- Location: Vouliagmeni (South Athens suburbs), Greece
- Has thanked: 1674 times
- Been thanked: 982 times
Re: CaK imaging with different aperture masks
Excellent comparison Arne!
Very useful and informative for all of us. Mark, Marty and other experienced people here repeatedly note how important masking is.
I wanted to do the same (going from 130 down to 80 mm), but I am very happy you showed it so clearly, so that there is no need to repeat what you did. Many many thanks!
Best wishes,
Alexandros
Very useful and informative for all of us. Mark, Marty and other experienced people here repeatedly note how important masking is.
I wanted to do the same (going from 130 down to 80 mm), but I am very happy you showed it so clearly, so that there is no need to repeat what you did. Many many thanks!
Best wishes,
Alexandros
Alexandros
Lunt 130MT+1800BF, C8 Ultima PEC+AstroSolar, Skywatcher Mount EQ6-R Pro
Baader Solar Prism, ZEISS Abbe Barlow 2x, Celestron Barlow 2x Ultima Series
ZWO ASI290MM, ZWO ASI1600MM Pro,
Greece
Lunt 130MT+1800BF, C8 Ultima PEC+AstroSolar, Skywatcher Mount EQ6-R Pro
Baader Solar Prism, ZEISS Abbe Barlow 2x, Celestron Barlow 2x Ultima Series
ZWO ASI290MM, ZWO ASI1600MM Pro,
Greece
- pedro
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 12320
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 8:26 pm
- Location: Portugal
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 6691 times
- Contact:
Re: CaK imaging with different aperture masks
I always image (Ca-K) with an F/10 focal ratio
Pedro Re'
https://pedroreastrophotography.com/
https://pedroreastrophotography.com/
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 1069
- Joined: Mon Jun 04, 2012 8:13 pm
- Location: London, England
- Has thanked: 47 times
- Been thanked: 1525 times
Re: CaK imaging with different aperture masks
Pedro: is it the f ratio or the aperture that most determines the quality?
-
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 6871
- Joined: Mon May 18, 2020 4:45 pm
- Location: Essex, S.E.England
- Been thanked: 4900 times
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42550
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20819 times
- Been thanked: 10489 times
- Contact:
Re: CaK imaging with different aperture masks
Super comparison Arne and really shows the effectiveness of masking. The 40mm aperture shows considerably finer detail than 61mm full aperture. Glad it was a good excuse for you to buy a 3D printer too
I think will give this topic a few more days here to get more coverage and then will pop it in the reference library...
I think will give this topic a few more days here to get more coverage and then will pop it in the reference library...
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
- arnedanielsen
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 7497
- Joined: Fri Apr 18, 2014 10:42 pm
- Location: Vestby, Norway
- Has thanked: 6305 times
- Been thanked: 7324 times
Re: CaK imaging with different aperture masks
Thank you everyone for all your kind comments and suggestions!
It sounds like the consensus is that the 40mm (360mm f/9) has the edge in this comparison.
Bob: Re-spacing the objective is not something I feel competent to try doing. However, I might be tempted to start looking for a new dedicated scope for CaK imaging. A scope with a focallength of 430-450mm would still give nice FD images on the 178mm sensor, but with an increased sampling.
Best regards,
Arne
It sounds like the consensus is that the 40mm (360mm f/9) has the edge in this comparison.
Bob: Re-spacing the objective is not something I feel competent to try doing. However, I might be tempted to start looking for a new dedicated scope for CaK imaging. A scope with a focallength of 430-450mm would still give nice FD images on the 178mm sensor, but with an increased sampling.
Best regards,
Arne
-
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 4:46 pm
- Location: France
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 2725 times
- Contact:
Re: CaK imaging with different aperture masks
Well done ! The 40 mm is the clear winner.
Christian Viladrich
Co-author of "Planetary Astronomy"
http://planetary-astronomy.com/
Editor of "Solar Astronomy"
http://www.astronomiesolaire.com/
Co-author of "Planetary Astronomy"
http://planetary-astronomy.com/
Editor of "Solar Astronomy"
http://www.astronomiesolaire.com/
- pedro
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 12320
- Joined: Sun May 01, 2016 8:26 pm
- Location: Portugal
- Has thanked: 14 times
- Been thanked: 6691 times
- Contact:
Re: CaK imaging with different aperture masks
The focal ratio. You should use F/10 every time. More aperture is always better, but usually seeing is bad in CaK
Pedro Re'
https://pedroreastrophotography.com/
https://pedroreastrophotography.com/
- AtiCelestron
- The Sun?
- Posts: 7
- Joined: Wed Feb 03, 2021 6:23 pm
- Been thanked: 7 times
Re: CaK imaging with different aperture masks
Hello Bob!Bob Yoesle wrote: ↑Sat Jun 19, 2021 4:17 pm Excellent comparison Arne!
The next step might include re-spacing the objective to optimize spherochromatic aberration, and see the effect of f-ratio on contrast performance.
I don't really know the re-spacing thing. Can IT improve the image quality , contrast if I place the lenses closer or farther apart?
I have a 120/1000 skywatcher telescope with Lunt LS50 system