Significant Solar Storm 6th March
- Carbon60
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 14205
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:33 pm
- Location: Lancashire, UK
- Has thanked: 8415 times
- Been thanked: 8161 times
Significant Solar Storm 6th March
This was one of those 'wow' moments, when my magnetometer here in the UK went wild in the late hours of March 6th indicating that a significantly geoeffective solar storm was in progress. The culprit was a fast flowing solar wind stream and southerly interplanetary magnetic field carried by plasma crossing the void of space between the Sun and Earth and linking up with our own magnetic field.
The result was a planetary Kp7 storm and bright aurora over high and mid latitudes, including over the UK and much of northern Europe. Here are my magnetometer data showing the whole event from start to finish.
And the 'rate of change'.
Thanks for looking.
Stu.
The result was a planetary Kp7 storm and bright aurora over high and mid latitudes, including over the UK and much of northern Europe. Here are my magnetometer data showing the whole event from start to finish.
And the 'rate of change'.
Thanks for looking.
Stu.
H-alpha, WL and Ca II K imaging kit for various image scales.
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence).
Radio meteor detector.
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence).
Radio meteor detector.
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/
-
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 12900
- Joined: Wed Oct 19, 2011 10:02 am
- Been thanked: 171 times
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42270
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20424 times
- Been thanked: 10243 times
- Contact:
Re: Significant Solar Storm 6th March
A good record there Stu!
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
- grimble_cornet
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 3537
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:10 pm
- Location: UK West Midlands
- Been thanked: 47 times
Re: Significant Solar Storm 6th March
Great trace Stu!
.
.
.
Mike Garbett
Selection of Solar and Deep Sky images on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mikegarbett/
.
.
Mike Garbett
Selection of Solar and Deep Sky images on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mikegarbett/
- Montana
- Librarian
- Posts: 34560
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
- Location: Cheshire, UK
- Has thanked: 17667 times
- Been thanked: 8788 times
Re: Significant Solar Storm 6th March
Fantastic catch Stu
Sadly it was cloudy, and I had to go to bed early ready for work the next day
Alexandra
Sadly it was cloudy, and I had to go to bed early ready for work the next day
Alexandra
- Carbon60
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 14205
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:33 pm
- Location: Lancashire, UK
- Has thanked: 8415 times
- Been thanked: 8161 times
Re: Significant Solar Storm 6th March
Many thanks, Derek, Mark, Mike and Alexandra.
Mike. I don't know if your magnetometer is still up and running, but you might want to change the filter value in the spread sheet (cell H4) from the default value to maybe 25-35 in order to enable the chart to display the magnetic perturbations properly. The filter normally is required to eliminate spurious events (odd spikes), but given the significant rates of change resulting from this event the filter is instead removing valuable data at its default value. You'll see what I mean if you make the change. I'd revert back to the default value for the more minor storms that we normally get, given that the data can be a little spikey otherwise.
Stu.
Mike. I don't know if your magnetometer is still up and running, but you might want to change the filter value in the spread sheet (cell H4) from the default value to maybe 25-35 in order to enable the chart to display the magnetic perturbations properly. The filter normally is required to eliminate spurious events (odd spikes), but given the significant rates of change resulting from this event the filter is instead removing valuable data at its default value. You'll see what I mean if you make the change. I'd revert back to the default value for the more minor storms that we normally get, given that the data can be a little spikey otherwise.
Stu.
H-alpha, WL and Ca II K imaging kit for various image scales.
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence).
Radio meteor detector.
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence).
Radio meteor detector.
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/
- Montana
- Librarian
- Posts: 34560
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
- Location: Cheshire, UK
- Has thanked: 17667 times
- Been thanked: 8788 times
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42270
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20424 times
- Been thanked: 10243 times
- Contact:
Re: Significant Solar Storm 6th March
Woohoo! Yes, well cool
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
- Carbon60
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 14205
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:33 pm
- Location: Lancashire, UK
- Has thanked: 8415 times
- Been thanked: 8161 times
Re: Significant Solar Storm 6th March
Many thanks, Alexandra/Mark.
It was a huge surprise this morning when I turned to Spaceweather.com for my morning fix and saw my chart in full view.
Cheers
Stu
It was a huge surprise this morning when I turned to Spaceweather.com for my morning fix and saw my chart in full view.
Cheers
Stu
H-alpha, WL and Ca II K imaging kit for various image scales.
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence).
Radio meteor detector.
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence).
Radio meteor detector.
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/
- grimble_cornet
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 3537
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:10 pm
- Location: UK West Midlands
- Been thanked: 47 times
Re: Significant Solar Storm 6th March
Thanks Stu - I'll check that out.
Also.... congrats on the Spaceweather showing!
Also.... congrats on the Spaceweather showing!
.
.
.
Mike Garbett
Selection of Solar and Deep Sky images on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mikegarbett/
.
.
Mike Garbett
Selection of Solar and Deep Sky images on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mikegarbett/
- p_zetner
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:59 pm
- Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Has thanked: 166 times
- Been thanked: 719 times
Re: Significant Solar Storm 6th March
Terrific capture, Stu!
That oscillatory behaviour at the peak is intriguing. Any idea of the physical origin?
Is it worth doing a Fourier analysis to check the frequency spectrum? I'd be happy to do it if you send me the data.
Cheers.
Peter.
That oscillatory behaviour at the peak is intriguing. Any idea of the physical origin?
Is it worth doing a Fourier analysis to check the frequency spectrum? I'd be happy to do it if you send me the data.
Cheers.
Peter.
- Carbon60
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 14205
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:33 pm
- Location: Lancashire, UK
- Has thanked: 8415 times
- Been thanked: 8161 times
Re: Significant Solar Storm 6th March
Thanks Mike/Peter.
Peter, it's an interesting thought. I could send you the data, no problem. Basically it's just a CSV file of time vs frequency, or I could send it as an excel file.
As for the physical origin, the interplanetary magnetic field, as measured by ACE and presented by NOAA, showed wild swings between north and south polarity over the duration of the storm, presumably imprinted within the solar plasma as it swept by. Interestingly there were no large coronal holes in the preceding days to account for the increasing effects of the solar wind, but Earth did pass through a CIR (Co-rotating Interaction Region) on March 6th, which is a bit of a coincidence, although Earth regularly passes through such regions with barely a glitch, so I'm not sure what really gave such power to this event.
For information, here are the ACE data for the last 7 days which show the tremendous surge on the 6th-7th.
Thanks for your interest.
Stu.
Peter, it's an interesting thought. I could send you the data, no problem. Basically it's just a CSV file of time vs frequency, or I could send it as an excel file.
As for the physical origin, the interplanetary magnetic field, as measured by ACE and presented by NOAA, showed wild swings between north and south polarity over the duration of the storm, presumably imprinted within the solar plasma as it swept by. Interestingly there were no large coronal holes in the preceding days to account for the increasing effects of the solar wind, but Earth did pass through a CIR (Co-rotating Interaction Region) on March 6th, which is a bit of a coincidence, although Earth regularly passes through such regions with barely a glitch, so I'm not sure what really gave such power to this event.
For information, here are the ACE data for the last 7 days which show the tremendous surge on the 6th-7th.
Thanks for your interest.
Stu.
H-alpha, WL and Ca II K imaging kit for various image scales.
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence).
Radio meteor detector.
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence).
Radio meteor detector.
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/
- p_zetner
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:59 pm
- Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Has thanked: 166 times
- Been thanked: 719 times
Re: Significant Solar Storm 6th March
Hi Stu.
I don't know if this is completely relevant but I came across a manuscript;
http://real.mtak.hu/27659/1/nakariakov_ ... es_rev.pdf
which made the following statements about the interaction of the solar wind with the magnetosphere:
"There is a possibility for the magnetosphere to oscillate wholly (or partially) as a collective cavity mode. Owing to this, the magnetosphere should behave as a kind of an MHD Fabry Perot resonator, absorbing the energy from the turbulent solar wind most effectively at the frequencies prescribed by the parameters of the cavity."
(I thought the Fabry Perot resonator was a pretty nifty analogy considering the nature of this forum!)
"Multi-harmonic signals with very stable frequencies (about 1 mHz, 1.3 mHz, 2.2 mHz, 2.6 mHz) called the 'magic frequencies' are often observed at high latitudes. The magic frequencies were interpreted as supporting evidence for the existence of the magnetospheric cavity mode resonance."
I wonder if the "magic frequencies" might be present in your data. The primary oscillation frequency looks to be about 1 mHz.
Cheers.
Peter.
I don't know if this is completely relevant but I came across a manuscript;
http://real.mtak.hu/27659/1/nakariakov_ ... es_rev.pdf
which made the following statements about the interaction of the solar wind with the magnetosphere:
"There is a possibility for the magnetosphere to oscillate wholly (or partially) as a collective cavity mode. Owing to this, the magnetosphere should behave as a kind of an MHD Fabry Perot resonator, absorbing the energy from the turbulent solar wind most effectively at the frequencies prescribed by the parameters of the cavity."
(I thought the Fabry Perot resonator was a pretty nifty analogy considering the nature of this forum!)
"Multi-harmonic signals with very stable frequencies (about 1 mHz, 1.3 mHz, 2.2 mHz, 2.6 mHz) called the 'magic frequencies' are often observed at high latitudes. The magic frequencies were interpreted as supporting evidence for the existence of the magnetospheric cavity mode resonance."
I wonder if the "magic frequencies" might be present in your data. The primary oscillation frequency looks to be about 1 mHz.
Cheers.
Peter.
- Carbon60
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 14205
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:33 pm
- Location: Lancashire, UK
- Has thanked: 8415 times
- Been thanked: 8161 times
Re: Significant Solar Storm 6th March
Very interesting, Peter. Would you prefer the data in excel format?
BTW, I've now converted the data into sound using MIDI to create a solar wind sound. Maybe more art than science, but hopefully interesting nevertheless.
Solar Storm 20160306 by Stuart Green, on Flickr
Stu.
BTW, I've now converted the data into sound using MIDI to create a solar wind sound. Maybe more art than science, but hopefully interesting nevertheless.
Solar Storm 20160306 by Stuart Green, on Flickr
Stu.
H-alpha, WL and Ca II K imaging kit for various image scales.
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence).
Radio meteor detector.
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence).
Radio meteor detector.
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/
- p_zetner
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:59 pm
- Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Has thanked: 166 times
- Been thanked: 719 times
Re: Significant Solar Storm 6th March
Hi Stu.
I think either the csv format data or the excel file would work for me. You could pm me and I'll give you my email address.
Peter.
Oh ... on 2nd thought ... I'll pm you with my email address!
Can you send rate of change data as well?
BTW How do you produce the rate of change data? Do you numerically differentiate?
I think either the csv format data or the excel file would work for me. You could pm me and I'll give you my email address.
Peter.
Oh ... on 2nd thought ... I'll pm you with my email address!
Can you send rate of change data as well?
BTW How do you produce the rate of change data? Do you numerically differentiate?
- p_zetner
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 1644
- Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2012 4:59 pm
- Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
- Has thanked: 166 times
- Been thanked: 719 times
Re: Significant Solar Storm 6th March
Hi Stu.
Here is some spectral analysis of your March 6 data: There's obviously a predominant peak at 0.41mHz with, possibly, three more peaks at the indicated frequencies. You have to take the identification of the three subsidiary peaks as somewhat tentative as I've identified them using a highly smoothed version of the raw FFT data. This technique can be a little unreliable because the smoothing can generate spurious peaks in scattered data. I tried multiple peak fitting but with no luck. What's interesting is that the observation correlates with findings published in the literature. For example, the paper:
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 29, NO. 8, 1197, 10.1029/2001GL014405, 2002
ULF waves in the solar wind as direct drivers of magnetospheric pulsations.
L. Kepko and H. E. Spence, H. J. Singer
http://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent ... ics_facpub
An extract: "Global magnetospheric ULF pulsations with frequencies in the Pc 5 range ( f = 1.7–6.7 mHz) and below have been observed for decades in space and on the Earth. Recent work has shown that in some cases these pulsations appear at discrete frequencies. Global cavity and waveguide modes have been offered as possible sources of such waves. In these models the magnetosphere is presumed to resonate globally at frequencies determined solely by its internal properties such as size, shape, field topology, mass density distribution, etc. We show in this work that upstream solar wind number density and dynamic pressure variations precede and drive compressional magnetic field variations at geosynchronous orbit. Furthermore, spectral analysis shows that wave power spectra in both the solar wind and magnetosphere contain peaks at the same discrete frequencies. Therefore, in contrast to the cavity mode hypothesis, we suggest that discrete ULF pulsations observed within the magnetosphere are at least sometimes directly driven by density oscillations present in the ambient solar wind.
... possibility is that the frequencies are the result of solar oscillations. ... The p modes of the sun are in the range of 1–5 mHz, the same interval as the waves reported in this paper. Though relating terrestrial ULF pulsations to solar oscillations is an intriguing possibility, subsequent work addressing whether the solar wind contains imprints of solar modes has yielded conflicting results ... and the issue remains unresolved."
Here are two of the paper's figures reproduced: You can see a general 4-peaked structure in the frequency spectrum as shown in your data.
I think it's interesting that the pulsations you're observing might be directly attributable to solar wind density variations which, themselves are driven by the oscillation of the Sun!
Cheers.
Peter.
Here is some spectral analysis of your March 6 data: There's obviously a predominant peak at 0.41mHz with, possibly, three more peaks at the indicated frequencies. You have to take the identification of the three subsidiary peaks as somewhat tentative as I've identified them using a highly smoothed version of the raw FFT data. This technique can be a little unreliable because the smoothing can generate spurious peaks in scattered data. I tried multiple peak fitting but with no luck. What's interesting is that the observation correlates with findings published in the literature. For example, the paper:
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 29, NO. 8, 1197, 10.1029/2001GL014405, 2002
ULF waves in the solar wind as direct drivers of magnetospheric pulsations.
L. Kepko and H. E. Spence, H. J. Singer
http://scholars.unh.edu/cgi/viewcontent ... ics_facpub
An extract: "Global magnetospheric ULF pulsations with frequencies in the Pc 5 range ( f = 1.7–6.7 mHz) and below have been observed for decades in space and on the Earth. Recent work has shown that in some cases these pulsations appear at discrete frequencies. Global cavity and waveguide modes have been offered as possible sources of such waves. In these models the magnetosphere is presumed to resonate globally at frequencies determined solely by its internal properties such as size, shape, field topology, mass density distribution, etc. We show in this work that upstream solar wind number density and dynamic pressure variations precede and drive compressional magnetic field variations at geosynchronous orbit. Furthermore, spectral analysis shows that wave power spectra in both the solar wind and magnetosphere contain peaks at the same discrete frequencies. Therefore, in contrast to the cavity mode hypothesis, we suggest that discrete ULF pulsations observed within the magnetosphere are at least sometimes directly driven by density oscillations present in the ambient solar wind.
... possibility is that the frequencies are the result of solar oscillations. ... The p modes of the sun are in the range of 1–5 mHz, the same interval as the waves reported in this paper. Though relating terrestrial ULF pulsations to solar oscillations is an intriguing possibility, subsequent work addressing whether the solar wind contains imprints of solar modes has yielded conflicting results ... and the issue remains unresolved."
Here are two of the paper's figures reproduced: You can see a general 4-peaked structure in the frequency spectrum as shown in your data.
I think it's interesting that the pulsations you're observing might be directly attributable to solar wind density variations which, themselves are driven by the oscillation of the Sun!
Cheers.
Peter.
- Carbon60
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 14205
- Joined: Wed Mar 07, 2012 12:33 pm
- Location: Lancashire, UK
- Has thanked: 8415 times
- Been thanked: 8161 times
Re: Significant Solar Storm 6th March
Many thanks, Peter.
This is really interesting and it somewhat justifies my process of converting terrestrial magnetic data into solar wind sounds. There does appear to be a correlation between the two. A better understanding of the true relationship would likely come from the availability of more space based data, as information about the true structure and dynamics of the inhomogeneous interplanetary solar wind over the expanse of our planet surely cannot be inferred from so few satellites.
Again, thanks for this and your interest in my data.
Regards
Stu.
This is really interesting and it somewhat justifies my process of converting terrestrial magnetic data into solar wind sounds. There does appear to be a correlation between the two. A better understanding of the true relationship would likely come from the availability of more space based data, as information about the true structure and dynamics of the inhomogeneous interplanetary solar wind over the expanse of our planet surely cannot be inferred from so few satellites.
Again, thanks for this and your interest in my data.
Regards
Stu.
H-alpha, WL and Ca II K imaging kit for various image scales.
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence).
Radio meteor detector.
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/
Fluxgate Magnetometers (1s and 150s Cadence).
Radio meteor detector.
More images at http://www.flickr.com/photos/solarcarbon60/