wedge issue
-
- Im an EXPERT!
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:58 pm
wedge issue
Anyone have issues with ES AR102 and a baader wedge not giving enough back focus? Attached is my setup. Can't use my 3x klee and attain focus.
- Attachments
-
- wedge.jpg (128.08 KiB) Viewed 3249 times
- solarchat
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4359
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 3:10 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA USA
- Has thanked: 83 times
- Been thanked: 1313 times
- Contact:
Re: wedge issue
most wedges require an extension tube to focus at long focal lengths and almost none of them focus at native focal length with a camera on a standard refractor.
Stephen W. Ramsden
Atlanta, GA USA
Founder/Director Charlie Bates Solar Astronomy Project
http://www.solarastronomy.org
Atlanta, GA USA
Founder/Director Charlie Bates Solar Astronomy Project
http://www.solarastronomy.org
- Valery
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 4059
- Joined: Sun Nov 18, 2012 3:13 pm
- Has thanked: 156 times
- Been thanked: 893 times
Re: wedge issue
Same in my 102mm F/7 APO. Baader wedge eats too much back focus and I can't focus it even with eyepieces. Only large 2" 32mm eyepiece can barely reach focus point. I will need to cut the back side of the tube to make it work with a binoviewer as well.papamidnight wrote:Anyone have issues with ES AR102 and a baader wedge not giving enough back focus? Attached is my setup. Can't use my 3x klee and attain focus.
"Solar H alpha activity is the most dynamic and compelling thing you can see in a telescope, so spend accordingly." (c) Bob Yoesle.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
Largest full size 185 - 356mm Dielectric Energy Rejection Filters (D-ERF) by ARIES Instruments.
- swisswalter
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 17948
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:28 am
- Location: Switzerland
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: wedge issue
Hi Scott
Long time no hear, welcome back. Sory tube shortening is almost the only thing that helps. I can reach Focus with the Pentaprisma on a standard WO 110, right out of the box.. O.k. not more than 2 mm left
Long time no hear, welcome back. Sory tube shortening is almost the only thing that helps. I can reach Focus with the Pentaprisma on a standard WO 110, right out of the box.. O.k. not more than 2 mm left
Only stardust in the wind, some fine and some less fine scopes, filters and adapters as well. Switzerland 47 N, 9 E, in the heart of EUROPE
from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa
from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa
- grimble_cornet
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 3537
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:10 pm
- Location: UK West Midlands
- Been thanked: 47 times
Re: wedge issue
I have the same problem with the newer model of the Baader ceramic wedge. Mine came with a very nice click-lock 2-1.25" adapter which made the back focus problem even worse!
Most people seem to swap the click-lock for a low-profile, traditional 1.25" only alternative which attaches directly to the wedge via the T-thread and saves enough space for my Lunt 60, Equinox 80 and 120mm scopes to work fine.
I remember being annoyed that the only way to buy the Baader wedge was complete with the quite expensive click-lock; which most people can't use and have to replace with another Baader adapter! However, the Tal 100RS which I bought mainly for use with a Lunt CaK1200 has even less back focus and will only work with the Baader wedge if I attach my camera directly to the wedge via a T-C mount adapter as shown in the image (not mine.......taken from the web when I was researching the problem). The adapter I use is only about 5mm thick with a T-thread on one face and a C-mount thread on the other. Only problem is that I can't use a Barlow with the Tal using any of these methods as there is so little back focus. I think Alexandra (Montana) had similar issues with the same wedge and her Tec 140 so she might have some other solution?
Hope this help,
Mike
Most people seem to swap the click-lock for a low-profile, traditional 1.25" only alternative which attaches directly to the wedge via the T-thread and saves enough space for my Lunt 60, Equinox 80 and 120mm scopes to work fine.
I remember being annoyed that the only way to buy the Baader wedge was complete with the quite expensive click-lock; which most people can't use and have to replace with another Baader adapter! However, the Tal 100RS which I bought mainly for use with a Lunt CaK1200 has even less back focus and will only work with the Baader wedge if I attach my camera directly to the wedge via a T-C mount adapter as shown in the image (not mine.......taken from the web when I was researching the problem). The adapter I use is only about 5mm thick with a T-thread on one face and a C-mount thread on the other. Only problem is that I can't use a Barlow with the Tal using any of these methods as there is so little back focus. I think Alexandra (Montana) had similar issues with the same wedge and her Tec 140 so she might have some other solution?
Hope this help,
Mike
.
.
.
Mike Garbett
Selection of Solar and Deep Sky images on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mikegarbett/
.
.
Mike Garbett
Selection of Solar and Deep Sky images on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mikegarbett/
- solarchat
- Site Admin
- Posts: 4359
- Joined: Sat Feb 01, 2014 3:10 pm
- Location: Atlanta, GA USA
- Has thanked: 83 times
- Been thanked: 1313 times
- Contact:
Re: wedge issue
I think you are referring to "in-focus" if it won't go in far enough to reach focus.
Stephen W. Ramsden
Atlanta, GA USA
Founder/Director Charlie Bates Solar Astronomy Project
http://www.solarastronomy.org
Atlanta, GA USA
Founder/Director Charlie Bates Solar Astronomy Project
http://www.solarastronomy.org
- grimble_cornet
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 3537
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:10 pm
- Location: UK West Midlands
- Been thanked: 47 times
Re: wedge issue
Er.......well yes, I do mean it won't go in far enough so 'in-focus' does make sense rather than 'out focus'. I was using the terminology which I have always used in relation to photography where 'back focus' means focusing behind or further away than your target - which requires the eye lens to move further in. Sorry for the confusion.
.
.
.
Mike Garbett
Selection of Solar and Deep Sky images on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mikegarbett/
.
.
Mike Garbett
Selection of Solar and Deep Sky images on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mikegarbett/
- Astrograph
- Im an EXPERT!
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 1:00 pm
- Location: London
- Been thanked: 46 times
- Contact:
Re: wedge issue
Hi
You can fix this problem easily enough. Most off the shelf scopes have about 170-180mm of back focus so anything with a long optical path eats it up.
Barlows will ADD back focus if they are put into the light path before anything else. Therefore put your barlow in front of the wedge. This will then increase the back focus enough to allow use with an oversize wedge. I have tested this with a 102 / F7 scope using a 2x barlow and Baader 2" Wedge and the view was very nice.
Of course if doing this you will need to add an ERF to protect the barlows optics. For this simply fit a UV/IR cut filter to the front of the barlow. If you plan to try any Ca-K imaging using a K-Line filter then you should choose either an Astronomik or IDAS UV/IR cut, NOT a Baader. This is because the Baaders block all UV below 420nm but the others allow the 390nm Ca-K lines to pass.
You can fix this problem easily enough. Most off the shelf scopes have about 170-180mm of back focus so anything with a long optical path eats it up.
Barlows will ADD back focus if they are put into the light path before anything else. Therefore put your barlow in front of the wedge. This will then increase the back focus enough to allow use with an oversize wedge. I have tested this with a 102 / F7 scope using a 2x barlow and Baader 2" Wedge and the view was very nice.
Of course if doing this you will need to add an ERF to protect the barlows optics. For this simply fit a UV/IR cut filter to the front of the barlow. If you plan to try any Ca-K imaging using a K-Line filter then you should choose either an Astronomik or IDAS UV/IR cut, NOT a Baader. This is because the Baaders block all UV below 420nm but the others allow the 390nm Ca-K lines to pass.
-
- Im an EXPERT!
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:58 pm
Re: wedge issue
Thanks all. The more I'm in this hobby the more I realize I need a true machine shop
- swisswalter
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 17948
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:28 am
- Location: Switzerland
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: wedge issue
Hi Mike
if of interest. There is a new "short" herschel wedge on the market in Austria for only 170 €
if of interest. There is a new "short" herschel wedge on the market in Austria for only 170 €
Only stardust in the wind, some fine and some less fine scopes, filters and adapters as well. Switzerland 47 N, 9 E, in the heart of EUROPE
from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa
from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa
- grimble_cornet
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 3537
- Joined: Tue Jul 10, 2012 5:10 pm
- Location: UK West Midlands
- Been thanked: 47 times
Re: wedge issue
That sounds pretty good value Walter. I decided to go with the Baader ceramic 'imager' version of their solar wedge a couple of years ago which was MUCH more expensive but. to be fair, it does come complete with 4 different 2 inch ND filters and a 2 inch continuum filter all in a robust metal case. It is also built like a tank, has its own very effective 'solar finder' (the sun's image on the ceramic heat sink) and, now I've sorted the back focus problem, works very well on all 4 of my refractors from 60 to 120mm. One of the best bits of kit I have ever purchased.
.
.
.
Mike Garbett
Selection of Solar and Deep Sky images on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mikegarbett/
.
.
Mike Garbett
Selection of Solar and Deep Sky images on Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/mikegarbett/
- swisswalter
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 17948
- Joined: Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:28 am
- Location: Switzerland
- Been thanked: 1 time
- Contact:
Re: wedge issue
thank you Mike
Only stardust in the wind, some fine and some less fine scopes, filters and adapters as well. Switzerland 47 N, 9 E, in the heart of EUROPE
from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa
from 7 am - 7 pm http://www.nanosys.ch
from 7.01 pm - 6.59 am http://www.wastronomiko.com some times vice versa
-
- Im an EXPERT!
- Posts: 297
- Joined: Wed Aug 01, 2012 5:58 pm
Re: wedge issue
A 4x power-mate in front of the wedge doesn't attain focus either. Time for some trimming.
- Astrograph
- Im an EXPERT!
- Posts: 241
- Joined: Tue Aug 05, 2014 1:00 pm
- Location: London
- Been thanked: 46 times
- Contact:
Re: wedge issue
Hi
Using a 4x tends to through up another problem.
If the Powermate is inserted well before the focal point, the amount it is inserted, lets say 100mm before focus, will mean that the new back focus distance from the powermate will be 4x this, so 400mm. If it were a 2x it would be 200mm.
What may have happened now is that you have now added so much back focus you can't make it work!
If your wedge is 2", first try the PM in the eyepiece end of the wedge. Failing that, put an extension tube before the Powermate so it is closer to the focal point of your scope.
No trimming needed!
Using a 4x tends to through up another problem.
If the Powermate is inserted well before the focal point, the amount it is inserted, lets say 100mm before focus, will mean that the new back focus distance from the powermate will be 4x this, so 400mm. If it were a 2x it would be 200mm.
What may have happened now is that you have now added so much back focus you can't make it work!
If your wedge is 2", first try the PM in the eyepiece end of the wedge. Failing that, put an extension tube before the Powermate so it is closer to the focal point of your scope.
No trimming needed!