Tips on buying a 150mm telescope for solar photography
-
- The Sun?
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2019 12:59 am
- Location: Rafaela - Argentina
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Tips on buying a 150mm telescope for solar photography
Hello everyone!
I want to buy a 150 mm aperture solar telescope, to photograph prominences and active regions in more detail. As I live in Argentina, with the restrictions that my country imposes on imports, I cannot fail in the choice of equipment, since it would be impossible to return or exchange it and there is not much market to sell it used. That is why I turn to the experience of all of you so that you can advise me. The first telescope I thought of was a Lunt 152 f6, initially single stack and later buying a second etalon to have a double stack. The other option is a TS Optics 150 f8 apo doublet and use it with a 0.6 Angstrom SE Quantum filter.
Will I have a much higher image quality with the Quantum filter compared to the Lunt? The image of Quantum filters is more homogeneous than that of Quark filters?
What other things should I keep in mind?
My current equipment is a Coronado Solarmax II 90mm telescope (I use it mainly for full disk imaging) and a Sky Watcher Esprit 120 with a Quark Chromosphere filter for details.
Thanks a lot!
I want to buy a 150 mm aperture solar telescope, to photograph prominences and active regions in more detail. As I live in Argentina, with the restrictions that my country imposes on imports, I cannot fail in the choice of equipment, since it would be impossible to return or exchange it and there is not much market to sell it used. That is why I turn to the experience of all of you so that you can advise me. The first telescope I thought of was a Lunt 152 f6, initially single stack and later buying a second etalon to have a double stack. The other option is a TS Optics 150 f8 apo doublet and use it with a 0.6 Angstrom SE Quantum filter.
Will I have a much higher image quality with the Quantum filter compared to the Lunt? The image of Quantum filters is more homogeneous than that of Quark filters?
What other things should I keep in mind?
My current equipment is a Coronado Solarmax II 90mm telescope (I use it mainly for full disk imaging) and a Sky Watcher Esprit 120 with a Quark Chromosphere filter for details.
Thanks a lot!
- marktownley
- Librarian
- Posts: 42550
- Joined: Tue Oct 18, 2011 5:27 pm
- Location: Brierley Hills, UK
- Has thanked: 20819 times
- Been thanked: 10489 times
- Contact:
Re: Tips on buying a 150mm telescope for solar photography
Hi there!
If you already have a good quark, assuming you're happy with it I would get a 150/8 doublet.
Who knows whether the Quantum will be better than the Quark - you would think so, but knowing what Daystar is like I wouldn't assume anything.
Mark
If you already have a good quark, assuming you're happy with it I would get a 150/8 doublet.
Who knows whether the Quantum will be better than the Quark - you would think so, but knowing what Daystar is like I wouldn't assume anything.
Mark
http://brierleyhillsolar.blogspot.co.uk/
Solar images, a collection of all the most up to date live solar data on the web, imaging & processing tutorials - please take a look!
- Montana
- Librarian
- Posts: 34722
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 5:25 pm
- Location: Cheshire, UK
- Has thanked: 17974 times
- Been thanked: 8906 times
Re: Tips on buying a 150mm telescope for solar photography
Mmm I was going to say if you have difficulty with returns, then I would avoid Daystar, but then if you are happy with your Quark then stick with it, don't tempt fate.
Alexandra
Alexandra
-
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 2161
- Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2015 4:46 pm
- Location: France
- Has thanked: 1 time
- Been thanked: 2725 times
- Contact:
Re: Tips on buying a 150mm telescope for solar photography
I would do as said by Mark and Alexandra. If you are happy with the Quark, go for the 150 mm f/8 and possibly a Baader ERF.
Christian Viladrich
Co-author of "Planetary Astronomy"
http://planetary-astronomy.com/
Editor of "Solar Astronomy"
http://www.astronomiesolaire.com/
Co-author of "Planetary Astronomy"
http://planetary-astronomy.com/
Editor of "Solar Astronomy"
http://www.astronomiesolaire.com/
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 843
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 2:53 pm
- Has thanked: 1640 times
- Been thanked: 878 times
Re: Tips on buying a 150mm telescope for solar photography
I would read the following thread. Just because you pay A LOT for a solar product does not mean it will be trouble free. If you are happy with your quark, I would stay with it.
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=29454
viewtopic.php?f=10&t=29454
-
- Ohhhhhh My!
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 12:26 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
Re: Tips on buying a 150mm telescope for solar photography
As advised I will use the Quark too. Be familiar with that combo. To be fair I have seen Quarks from very bad to excellent... If your Quark is good - keep it. I do have a Quantum SE 0.6 A filter. And I even have a test sheet. It is better than any Quarks I have tested. To be honest my concerns regarding Quantum filters are from this forum and some filters I have seen. Sometimes I had really been thinking about upgrading service to get a more narrowband filter. But to have an etalon from founder Del Woods - well I know for sure I will keep it.
It is the reason I have a SolarSpectrum 0.3 A filter now. 2 great filters. I will always recommend Marks filters.
It is the reason I have a SolarSpectrum 0.3 A filter now. 2 great filters. I will always recommend Marks filters.
- rsfoto
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 6306
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:30 pm
- Location: San Luis Potosi, México
- Has thanked: 9723 times
- Been thanked: 5773 times
Re: Tips on buying a 150mm telescope for solar photography
Hola,
Te mandé un correo privado. Saludos
Te mandé un correo privado. Saludos
regards Rainer
Observatorio Real de 14
San Luis Potosi Mexico
North 22° West 101°
Observatorio Real de 14
San Luis Potosi Mexico
North 22° West 101°
-
- Im an EXPERT!
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2020 9:25 pm
- Location: Austin Texas
- Has thanked: 148 times
- Been thanked: 294 times
Re: Tips on buying a 150mm telescope for solar photography
I would second the recommendation of SolarSpectrum filters. I love mine and have never read of a complaint
-
- The Sun?
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2019 12:59 am
- Location: Rafaela - Argentina
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Tips on buying a 150mm telescope for solar photography
Thanks Christian for your answer!!christian viladrich wrote: ↑Thu Apr 08, 2021 8:56 am I would do as said by Mark and Alexandra. If you are happy with the Quark, go for the 150 mm f/8 and possibly a Baader ERF.
It seems like a good option to go for a doublet and use my Quark.
One more question... What is the difference in image quality between a Lunt 152 f/6 and using a doublet with my Quark filter? Or rather how good are the etalons used by the Lunt 152? I am attracted to the versatility of the Lunt, since I could also use it to make full disk images and with a barlow to obtain details.
Thank you!!
- rsfoto
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 6306
- Joined: Mon Jun 18, 2012 8:30 pm
- Location: San Luis Potosi, México
- Has thanked: 9723 times
- Been thanked: 5773 times
Re: Tips on buying a 150mm telescope for solar photography
Hi,
Does the 152 mm Lunt telescope come with a test sheet ?
Does the 152 mm Lunt telescope come with a test sheet ?
regards Rainer
Observatorio Real de 14
San Luis Potosi Mexico
North 22° West 101°
Observatorio Real de 14
San Luis Potosi Mexico
North 22° West 101°
-
- Almost There...
- Posts: 843
- Joined: Sat Apr 08, 2017 2:53 pm
- Has thanked: 1640 times
- Been thanked: 878 times
Re: Tips on buying a 150mm telescope for solar photography
I have owned three Lunts (2 80 DS and 100 DS) and none came with test sheet
-
- Ohhhhhh My!
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 12:26 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
Re: Tips on buying a 150mm telescope for solar photography
If you have a more than okay Quark - the single stack Lunt will not show more details - but you can image the full disk. Side by side my 0.6 A Quantum and a Bresser 127mm f9 doblet was a little bit better on surface details and stunningly better on prominences... A very good Quark at the same meeting did outperform all filters on surface details. But as you know, Quarks specifications can vary from a PE 0.2A to worser than a 0.7A SE filter.
-
- The Sun?
- Posts: 17
- Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2019 12:59 am
- Location: Rafaela - Argentina
- Has thanked: 18 times
- Been thanked: 4 times
Re: Tips on buying a 150mm telescope for solar photography
Ljungmann wrote: ↑Fri Apr 09, 2021 8:21 pm If you have a more than okay Quark - the single stack Lunt will not show more details - but you can image the full disk. Side by side my 0.6 A Quantum and a Bresser 127mm f9 doblet was a little bit better on surface details and stunningly better on prominences... A very good Quark at the same meeting did outperform all filters on surface details. But as you know, Quarks specifications can vary from a PE 0.2A to worser than a 0.7A SE filter.
Thank you very much for your answer!
Could you compare your Bresser 127 with Quantum filter side by side with a Lunt 152? I was interested in what you say about the prominences, I thought that the Lunt having a larger aperture could show more detailed and bright images of them.
-
- Ohhhhhh My!
- Posts: 52
- Joined: Wed Oct 21, 2020 12:26 pm
- Has thanked: 2 times
- Been thanked: 58 times
Re: Tips on buying a 150mm telescope for solar photography
It can be tricky to say why a filter performes better. But transmission is one of the more delicate issues in a solid etalon system. Mica can behave in different ways. It is often not neutral in color. Homogeneity and transmission can do a lot in the contrast department. I have seen in a 0.4A SE Quantum filter with very low transmission and I was not impressed. My Del Woods mica 0.6A etalon has a very high transmission (people do say to me that its to bright and you need a neutral filter!) but I like it. It is one of the main reasons I can see a lot of delicate prominences and extremely lots of details too. The other thing is that it has 0 reflections and no ghost image. The background is black as in black. I think it all helps. But you never know what transmission your filter have before you actually look at the Sun for the first time.
It is one of the reasons I do like SS filters. Mark will always work around the transmission profile to get the optimised filter stack. It is easy to see it in my own 0.3A filter. And I think Del Woods did the same in the old Daystar days.
It is one of the reasons I do like SS filters. Mark will always work around the transmission profile to get the optimised filter stack. It is easy to see it in my own 0.3A filter. And I think Del Woods did the same in the old Daystar days.
- MalVeauX
- Way More Fun to Share It!!
- Posts: 1861
- Joined: Tue May 09, 2017 7:58 pm
- Location: Florida
- Has thanked: 1188 times
- Been thanked: 1382 times
Re: Tips on buying a 150mm telescope for solar photography
Hi,
First, I would say you need to get an idea of your seeing conditions. Taking a mica-spaced etalon to F30~F40 with a 150mm aperture requires excellent seeing conditions, even with a reducer. To even benefit this aperture's resolution potential you need around 1 arc-second seeing (slightly better than 1 arc-second would be far more ideal). Otherwise, in reality, you're losing resolution to whatever the seeing actually is. Thankfully you can aperture mask a refractor for this purpose if needed, but the focal-length remains so you are pushing very fine image scales often when seeing isn't supporting it.
If your Quark is good enough, stick with it. I would argue any etalon from Lunt will likely be superior to an average Daystar one and it will be a lot more fuss-free (no electronics, not mica-spaced, etc). A pressure tuned Lunt etalon would be a way better gamble of all options out there in my opinion.
Very best,
First, I would say you need to get an idea of your seeing conditions. Taking a mica-spaced etalon to F30~F40 with a 150mm aperture requires excellent seeing conditions, even with a reducer. To even benefit this aperture's resolution potential you need around 1 arc-second seeing (slightly better than 1 arc-second would be far more ideal). Otherwise, in reality, you're losing resolution to whatever the seeing actually is. Thankfully you can aperture mask a refractor for this purpose if needed, but the focal-length remains so you are pushing very fine image scales often when seeing isn't supporting it.
If your Quark is good enough, stick with it. I would argue any etalon from Lunt will likely be superior to an average Daystar one and it will be a lot more fuss-free (no electronics, not mica-spaced, etc). A pressure tuned Lunt etalon would be a way better gamble of all options out there in my opinion.
Very best,